Sources: Democratic Underground & Herald Tribune
يمكنك قراءة الموضوع باللغة العربية بالضغط على: هذا الرابط
Published: February 26, 2007
CARACAS, Venezuela: Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez called his U.S. counterpart George W. Bush the “king of liars” on Monday, predicting that the U.S. leader would not receive a warm reception on his upcoming Latin American tour.
“The South American people will give a welcome to the little gentleman from the North, the king of invaders, the king of liars,” Chavez said referring to Bush’s planned tour next month to Brazil, Uruguay, Colombia, Guatemala and Mexico.
“It is going to be more interesting that you think, the visit of the little gentleman,” Chavez told his listeners on his weekday radio talk show, “Hello President.”
Predicting that protesters will take to the streets, Chavez said, “Let’s hope there won’t be violence. We are not supporters of that.”
Chavez has accused Bush of making the trip in order to try and divide the region and launch a diplomatic offensive to isolate his government, which is fiercely critical of Washington and closely allied to Cuba’s Fidel Castro.
The White House has said Bush’s trip is aimed at underlining the U.S. government’s commitment to the region and advancing democracy and its benefits, including health, education and economic opportunities.
Question: How is Bush going to react upon what Chavez have said?



March 10, 2007 at 7:48 am |
Why to dicuss about the lies of Bush every now and then, we have seen the words of Bush not incompitablity with his deeds. He has dragged the whole world in an endless war and destruction in the name of so called democracy. We are observing the stance of Latien Amarican countries, who are charged against the present policie of Amarica. If the third world countries need to redress and repair the demage, i will suggest them to declare the Amarica a rogued state.Amarican people have become voulnerable outside their country because a hatered has developed every where against them for the missdeeds of their present leadership and it iz ironic that the annoyed states of the third world have not joined their hands as yet to work out a precise modus operandi against the policies of a world terrorist who iz becoming more dangerous for mankind .