Islam- A Religion of Terror?

Invitation to Islam, Issue 5, October 1998

A bomb goes off in a marketplace in Jerusalem. A suicide bomber launches himself into a bus full of women and children in Tel Aviv. Foreign tourists get massacred at a holiday resort in
Luxor, Egypt. Villages upon villages get annihilated in
Algeria. The list of events worldwide which have come to symbolise the ‘Islamic terror’ are endless. From the times in the 70’s and 80’s when Pan Am and TWA aeroplanes would be highjacked, to the mid 80’s in war torn Lebanon where Americans and Europeans would be held as hostages for years; all such incidents have come to be identified with the religion of Islam. Such incidents from past and present have undoubtedly affected Muslims worldwide and more so in the West. Any Muslim, who wants to practice his/her religion and expresses the pious desire to live under the banner of Islam, is labelled a fundamentalist or extremist. Any Muslim man who walks down a busy street in London or Paris (and Paris moreso) with a beard and a scarf on his head, is looked upon as being a terrorist who’s probably got an AK47 stashed somewhere on his person. Muslim women who are veiled can’t go anywhere in the Western world without being taunted as being oppressed or being mad (for covering up). However, are such beliefs and opinions about Islam really justified? Exploding the myth One of the many short comings which has arisen in the West, is judging Islam by the conduct of a minority of its people. By doing this, segments of Western society have deliberately played off the desperate actions of many Muslims, and have given it the name of Islam. Such behaviour is clearly not objective and seeks to distort the reality of Islam. For if such a thing was done – judge a religion by the conduct of its people – then we too could say that all Christianity is about is child molesting and homosexuality [1] whilst Hinduism was all about looting and breaking up mosques [2]. Generalising in such a manner is not seen as being objective, yet we find that the Western world is foremost in propagating this outlook on Islam. So what is the reality of Islam? How does one dispel the myths which have been created and spread so viciously? The only way to examine Islam is to simply examine its belief system. Look at its sources, the Qur’an and Sunna, and see what they have to say. This is the way to find the truth about what Islam says about terror, terrorism and terrorists. One who is sincerely searching for the truth, will do it no other way. The very name Islam comes from the Arabic root word ’salama’ which means peace. Islam is a religion which is based upon achieving peace through the submission to the will of Allah. Thus, by this very simple linguistic definition, one can ascertain as to what the nature of this religion is. If such a religion is based on the notion of peace, then how is it that so many acts done by its adherents are contrary to peace? The answer is simple. Such actions, if not sanctioned by the religion, have no place with it. They are not Islamic and should not be thought of as Islamic.JihadThe word jihad sends shivers down the spines of many Westerners. They readily equate this term with violence and oppression. However, it must be said that the meaning of jihad, as a ‘holy war’, is something which is totally foreign and not from Islam. If anything, such a description belongs more so to Christianity and its adherents. It was terms like this which were used to justify the slaughter and pillage of towns and cities during the crusades by the Christians. By simply looking into the sources of Islam, one is able to know that the true meaning of jihad is to strive/make effort in the way of Allah. Thus striving in the way of Allah can be both peaceful and physical. The Prophet Muhammed (saws) said: “The best jihad is (by) the one who strives against his own self for Allah, The Mighty and Majestic” [3]In the Qur’an, Allah also says: “So obey not the disbelievers, but make a great jihad (effort) against them (by preaching) with it (the Qur’an)”
(Surah Al-Furqan 25:52)By controlling and fighting against ones desires, the Muslims can then also physically exert themselves in the path of Allah. It is this physical or combative jihad which receives so much criticism. Because of the sheer ignorance of this type of jihad Islam is regarded as terror, and Muslims are regarded as terrorists. However, the very purpose of this physical jihad is to raise the word of Allah uppermost. By doing this, it liberates and emancipates all those who are crying out for freedom all over the world. If the likes of the pacifists of this world had their way, then the world would indeed be full of anarchy and mischief. The combative jihad seeks to correct this as Allah says in the Qur’an:“And if Allah did not check one set of people by means of another, the Earth would be full of mischief. But Allah is full of bounty to the worlds”
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:251)Such would be the corruption on this Earth if there had never been a combative jihad that Allah says: “For had it not been that Allah checks one set of people by means of another, monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques, wherein the name of Allah is mentioned much, would surely have been pulled down. Indeed Allah will help those who help His (cause). Truly Allah is All strong, All mighty”
(Surah Al-Hajj 22:40)This combative jihad being both defensive and offensive, is something which is commanded by Allah upon the Muslims. Through this command the oppressed and weak are rescued from the tyranny of the world:“And what is the matter with you that you do not fight in the cause of Allah and for those weak, ill treated and oppressed among men, women and children whose only cry is; ‘Our Lord, rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors and raise for us from you one who will protect and raise for us from you one who will help”
(Surah An-Nisa 4:75)Anyone who knows the early history of Islam, will know that all those nations and empires which came under the fold of Islam were indeed previously oppressed. When the companions of the Prophet Muhammed (saws) went out for the offensive jihad against the Egyptians, the Persians and the Romans, we find that the people did not resist against them at all. Rather, they accepted Islam on such a scale, that it is inconceivable that the jihad of Islam could be anything other then a liberation for these people; a liberation from centuries of tyranny. In fact, with the Byzantine Egyptians and the people of Spain, the Muslims were even beckoned to come and liberate these lands from the oppression of their kings. This is the glorious track record of the Muslim jihad. Compare this with the brutal track record of warfare in the Western world over the centuries. From the crusades against the Muslims to the days of colonial warfare, the Western world has killed, destroyed and plundered everything which has come in its way. Even today this merciless killing goes on by the Western nations. While claiming to be about world peace and security, Western nations are ready to bomb innocent civilians at the drop of a hat. The classic example of this is the recent bombings of Sudan and
Afghanistan. Whilst claiming that Sudan and Afghanistan were havens for Islamic terrorists, the bombings of these two nations could not have come at a better time for the American president Bill Clinton. The destruction of innocent lives which were a result of these bombings clearly seem to have been an attempt by Clinton to avert attention away from his sexual misdemeanours; [4] something which he so often gets caught up in. Without doubt this was the reason for such terror from the American military upon innocent people. This is the same American military which claims to enter the worlds trouble spots under the guise of being peace keepers. But“… when it is said to them; ‘Make not mischief on the Earth’, they say; ‘We are only peace makers’. Indeed they are the ones who make mischief, but they perceive it not”
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:11-12)The hypocrisy of the West is indeed astounding.By looking at the rules and regulations of this combative jihad it will be clear to any sincere person that this is indeed the religion of truth. When fighting an unjust enemy, no matter how unjust they are, it is forbidden by Islam that their retreating forces are mutilated, tortured or slaughtered. The treacherous violation of treaties and carrying out assassinations after a cease fire, are also prohibited. Allah says in the Qur’an:
“And fight in the way of Allah those who fight you. But do not transgress the limits. Truly Allah loves not the transgressors”
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:190)Not transgressing the limits means not to kill women and children, for the Messenger of Allah (saws) “forbade the killing of women and children” [5]. Not transgressing the limits means that the elderly, the sick, monks, worshippers and hired labourers are not attacked. Not transgressing the limits means not killing animals wantonly, burning crops and vegetation, polluting waters and destroying homes, monasteries, churches and synagogues: “Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and kindly with those who fought not against you on account of religion, nor drove you out of your homes. Indeed, Allah loves those who deal with equity”
(Surah Al-Mumtahinah 60:8)After reading such passages from the Qur’an and knowing about what Islam commands and prohibits in jihad, the rules of warfare are given a new meaning; a meaning of justice. How sad it is then, that whilst Islam is condemned for striking terror into the hearts of the people, the likes of the Serbs, the Indian army in
Kashmir and the Israeli soldiers in
Palestine are left untarnished for the atrocities they have committed in the name of warfare.So what about suicide bombing, is this too a part of jihad in Allah’s path? From what has already been stated above, it can be deduced that this is not from the religion. However, unfortunately many Muslims have taken suicide bombing as being a virtuous act by which one receives reward. This could not be further from the truth. The Prophet (saws) said: “Those who go to extremes are destroyed” [6]. Suicide bombing is undoubtedly an extremity which has reached the ranks of the Muslims. In the rules of warfare, we find no sanction for such an act from the behaviour and words of the Prophet Muhammed (saws) and his companions. Unfortunately, today (some misguided) Muslims believe that such acts are paving the way for an Islamic revival and a return to the rule of Islam’s glorious law. However, we fail to bear in mind that the Prophet (saws) said: “Do not be delighted by the action of anyone, until you see how he ends up” [7]So, for example what is the end of a suicide bomber in
Palestine?, a leg here, an arm there. Massive retaliation by the Israeli’s in the West Bank and Gaza. More Muslims killed and persecuted. How can we be delighted with such an end? What really hammers the final nail in the coffin of this act, is that it is suicide; something which is clearly forbidden in Islam. The Messenger of Allah (saws) said: “He who kills himself with anything, Allah will torment him with that in the fire of Hell” [8]Some are under the misconception that by killing oneself for an Islamic cause, one commits an act which deserves
Paradise. Once when a man killed himself, the Prophet (saws) said: “He is a dweller of the Fire”. When the people were surprised at this, the Prophet (saws) said: “A person performs the deeds which to the people appears to be the deeds befitting the dweller of Paradise, but he is in fact one of the dwellers of the Fire” [9]The taking of ones life which Allah has given as a trust to the human, is a great sin. Likewise the taking of other lives (which is so often the case with suicide bombing) is also forbidden, as human life is indeed precious: “…If anyone killed a person not in retaliation for murder or to spread mischief in the land, it would be as if he killed the whole of mankind. And (likewise) if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole of mankind”
(Surah Al-Maaida 5:32)Thus, all other types of extremities such as hostage taking, hijacking and planting bombs in public places, are clearly forbidden in Islam.The Media By going through the teachings of Islam, it is clear that such a religion has only come to benefit mankind – not to destroy it. So why is there so much hatred for this noble religion in the West? The answer is simple, the media. It is the Jewish influenced media of the West which has portrayed Islam to be something that it is not. During the 70’s and 80’s when the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organisation) were carrying out daring highjacks on the worlds airways, the media in the West portrayed it as being Islamic. When the Shi’ite suicide bombers of the 80’s were causing so much havoc in Lebanon and in the Gulf region, the media in the West portrayed it as a part of Islam. However, it is known by the heads of the media that the likes of the PLO were not an Islamic organisation, and that according to Islam, Shi’ites are outside the fold of Islam [10]. Yet such facts are never portrayed by a media which seeks to cover the truth of this religion. A number of years ago, when the Oklahoma City bomb went off, a headline in one of the newspapers, ‘Today’ [11], summed up this attitude. With a picture of a fire fighter holding a dead child in his arms, the headline read: “In The Name of Islam” Time has of course proven that this bigoted assumption was incorrect, as Timothy McVeigh, a right wing radical now faces the death penalty for the crime [12]. Likewise the bombs which went off in the Paris metro in 1995, were also blamed on Muslim fanatics. It has now emerged that the Algerian secret service who having routinely bribed many European journalists and MPs, were actually behind it. The desire to throw a veil over Islam is immense by these people:“They intend to put out the light of Allah with their mouths, but Allah will complete His light even though the disbelievers hate (it)”
(Surah As-Saff 61:8)Whilst trying to destroy Islam through this instrument of the media, the Jews clearly try to portray an image of themselves as being the oppressed people. Every year, we are reminded as to how many Jews perished under the Nazis in World War II. We are made to feel sorry for these same people who have gone on to commit so many crimes upon the Palestinian people. Some may say that this is a racist and biased viewpoint. But we say; If this media was not run and orchestrated by the Jews and was truly neutral, then why are Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, two former Israeli prime ministers, not held aloft as being terrorists? Anyone who knows about the history of the Palestinian occupation will tell you that these two men were members of the Stern Gang and Irgun, two notorious Jewish terror groups who killed many innocent people [13]. If this media was truly impartial, then why does it not tell about the extent of the Israeli bombardment and illegal occupation of Southern Lebanon and its people? [14] And if this media really had nothing against the religion of Allah, then why does it not inform the people that every day hundreds are entering the religion of Islam? Such things will never be highlighted in the Western media, simply because to do so would be against their very interests.With such immense pressure against it, it is indeed a blessing from Allah that Islam goes from strength to strength. It continues to grow faster then any other religion in the Western world, conquering the hearts and minds of thousands. All this should not even surprise us though, for Allah has promised us that this religion will prevail:“It is He who has sent His Messenger with the guidance and the religion of truth, so that He may make it victorious over all other religions, even though the disbelievers detest it”
(Surah As-Saff 61:9)It is a must that humanity comes towards the religion of Islam. Without it, we will continue to slip down the road of inequity and darkness. With it we can establish a society of justice and peace. Religion of terror? … no. The way forward? … yes.

“There is no compulsion in religion. The right path has indeed become distinct from the wrong. So whoever rejects false worship and believes in Allah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break. And Allah is All Hearing, All Knowing”
(Surah Al-Baqarah 2:256)

Footnotes

[1] By using the many cases of child abuse and homosexuality by priests, Such a generalisation about Christianity could be made
[2] By using the incident of the destruction of the Babri mosque in Ayodya, India in December 1992 by Hindu zealots, such generalisations could be made about Hinduism
[3] Authentic – Reported by At-Tabaranee
[4] Years of sexual liaison with a White House aide, Monica Lewinski, has been proved against Mr Clinton. Since this time, a number of other women have also claimed that they have had affairs with the president. And this is the same man who propagates family values and to whom millions look up to!
[5] Reported by Bukhari – Eng. Trans, Vol.4, p. 160, No. 258
[6] Authentic – Reported by Ahmed
[7] Authentic – Reported by Ahmed
[8] Reported by Muslim – Eng. Trans, Vol. 1, p.62, No.203
[9] Reported by Muslim – Eng. Trans, Vol. 1, p.64, No.206
[10] The beliefs which are contained in the books of the Shi’ites places them outside of the fold of Islam generally. However, upon the individual Shi’ite, the proofs need to be established before one can say that he or she is a disbeliever
[11] This newspaper no longer exists
[12] It is strange indeed that whilst the Western media criticises Islamic law for being barbaric and harsh, not a word is said about the fact that McVeigh too will be executed just as someone would in an Islamic state
[13] These two groups killed Arabs, Jews and the British. They are accredited with the massacre at the village of Deir Yassin, in which many innocent people were butchered
[14] Despite the fact that the UN has even made a resolution against Israel for this illegal occupation, no ‘democratic peace loving nation’ (like the USA!) has bothered to implement it.

Source: TheTrueReligion

4 Responses to “Islam- A Religion of Terror?”

  1. Poseidon Says:

    This is about who is really behind terror attacks, including some of Israel’s false-flag terrorism in Egypt. Begin’s Irgun group gets a mention. Although only around 30 KB, I have built in some 100 hyperlinks for the researcher. Please see source at bottom…

    This is how a press conference might run if the corrupt mainstream media were suddenly replaced with a free press:

    Official White Horse Souse: The President is now ready and willing to answer any questions that you may care to put to him. He will begin with a short introduction relating to the war on terror. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the President of the United States!

    GWB: Thank y’all, thank you for coming. As you know, Osama bin Laden, who lives in a cave in Afghanistan, decided to attack the Twin Towers and the Pentagon because he doesn’t like our freedoms. We must always be on our guard against outrageous conspiracy theories that seek to shift the blame for these crimes away from the terrorists and the guilty. Those who concoct and peddle the conspiracy theories are filthy, stinking terrorists and traitors who hate America. We know who did the attacks on 9/11 because we found the passport of one of them in Vesey Street. Or was it a few blocks from the former World Trade Center site? No matter. I always say the best thing to do with these here terrorists is to nuke ‘em, but they tell me to hold back for a while.

    Skeptic: Sir, how can we confirm that a terrorist’s passport was really found? Isn’t it rather odd that it flew out of the terrorist’s pocket, out of the building, and survived one of the massive jet fuel fireballs that, we are told, wreaked so much havoc that they brought about the unprecedented collapse of three steel-framed high-rises?

    GWB: Dammit, you guys usually ask easier questions. I’m told we have a very logical case. (Refers to briefing sheet.) #1 No police are corrupt, Bernard Kerik was a Police Commissioner, therefore Kerik would not have lied about finding a passport. #2 Muslims did 9/11, Philip Zelikow is head of the 9/11 Commission, Zelikow is Jewish, no Jews are Muslims, hence the 9/11 Commission would not have lied about finding a passport. #3 Satam al-Suqami’s passport was found, ergo Muslims did 9/11.

    2nd Skeptic: Whoa! Mr Kerik has recently been arrested and ordered to pay $221,000 in fines. Even before his appointment as New York City police commissioner, he was suspected of shady business dealings and links to organized crime. He is also linked to a certain Rudolph Giuliani. On the morning of July 7, 2005, Giuliani and Benjamin Netanyahu were both in London when three trains and a bus were attacked, allegedly by suicide bombers. The official story was belied by evidence indicating bombs were pre-installed beneath the carriages, and the impossibility of the claimed timeline given the actual train times on the day, inter alia. On July 6, 2005, we can place Giuliani in Yorkshire, which is where three of the alleged suicide bombers lived – the day prior to those attacks. Someone had to plant “primed bombs” to be ‘found’ in Yorkshire, and obtain a till receipt from a Leeds garden center for plastic containers that could then be ‘found’ at a blast scene, in pristine condition like the Suqami passport. And what’s more, Netanyahu received advance warning of the bombings! These two were also at the scene of the 9/11 attacks. Netanyahu said 9/11 would be “very good” for Israel, and Giuliani banned photography and restricted access to the former World Trade Center site, and had the steel recycled so quickly that Fire Engineering magazine condemned the destruction of evidence and described the ASCE investigation as a “half-baked farce”. Netanyahu was a unit team leader in the IDF’s elite special forces unit Sayeret Matkal, former Israeli prime minister, probable former CIA operative, and close friend of Larry Silverstein who, along with Australian billionaire Frank Lowy who was recently embroiled in a corruption scandal with current Israeli premier Ehud Olmert, took over the World Trade Center lease and insured the WTC complex for billions of dollars against terrorist attacks a mere six weeks prior to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The handsome insurance policy contained a clause stating that in the event of a terrorist attack, the partners could not only collect the insured value of the property, but would also be released from all of their obligations under the 99-year lease.

    GWB: You dirty terrorist! Take him away! They’ll be able to interrogate him at Guantanamo, where he’ll get all the water he needs. (Smirks, eyes light up.)

    3rd Skeptic: But what about this Philip Zelikow, a Jewish writer and professor of history who, back in 1998, wrote of a “transforming event” rather like “Pearl Harbor”, which would “divide our past and future into a before and after”? What if Jews are not all saints? After all, Ze’ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky was the father of Revisionist Zionism, a militant faction within Zionism. Benjamin Netanyahu’s father Benzion was Jabotinsky’s secretary and pallbearer. Revisionist Zionism spawned the Irgun, an even more extremist group led by future Israeli premier Menachem Begin. The Irgun was one of several Jewish terrorist groups. In 1946, Begin’s Irgun Jewish terrorists dressed as Arabs bombed the King David Hotel, killing 92 people. That same year, his Jewish terrorists plotted to assassinate British foreign secretary Ernest Bevin. Fortunately, the conspiracy was foiled by MI6. Ironically, Begin went on to win a Nobel peace prize in 1978. In 1954, an Israeli spy ring was arrested in Egypt. These Israeli secret service agents had been assigned to attack US and British interests in Egypt; the blame would then be pinned on Egypt. The Israeli defense minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to resign as a result of the scandal, and the incident became known as the Lavon Affair. In these 1954 attacks, it is worth noting that Israel employed phosphorus incendiaries to set fire to US offices in Cairo and Alexandria. Then, late on February 2, 2006, contact was lost with Egypt’s al-Salam Boccaccio ‘98 ferry, which caught fire when a truck erupted in flames in the hold. The ferry sank in the Red Sea three hours later, with the loss of around 1,000 lives. On January 30, 2006, the Egyptian Parliament had unanimously rejected Israel’s call to observe January 27 as a “Holocaust Memorial Day”. It appears that a truck was loaded with phosphorus and a timer cum ignition device and driven onto the ferry, and the drainage pumps were sabotaged. The fire on the ferry mysteriously kept reigniting, and the drainage pumps failed. In the summer of 2006, Israel used phosphorus shells in its second war in Lebanon. Back in 1967, Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats carried out a sustained attack on the USS Liberty in international waters, even to the extent of machine-gunning the lifeboats at close range that had been launched to save the most seriously wounded. US President Lyndon Johnson said at the time, “I don’t give a damn if every man drowns and the ship sinks. I don’t want to embarrass our allies.” The attack killed 34 and injured 174. Israel’s plan was to sink the ship, attempt to kill all survivors to prevent them talking, and then pin the blame on Egypt, possibly provoking the US into launching a nuclear strike against Israel’s foe.

    GWB: You filthy, stinking anti-Semite! Take him to Abu Ghraib! He will soon rue the day he was born. (Emits maniacal chuckle.)

    4th Skeptic: On September 10, 2001, the Washington Times reported that the School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), an elite US Army study center, had this to say about Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” The very same day, Donald Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion of Pentagon transactions could not be tracked. The Pentagon Comptroller was Rabbi Dov Zakheim, whose previous position was at SPC, a world leader in aircraft remote control technology incorporating a “Flight Termination System” capable of taking over a number of in-flight aircraft and issuing commands via a “Command Transmitter System”. In shades of Zelikow, Zakheim had been co-author of a document which called for a “new Pearl Harbor” in order to secure the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) goal of world hegemony. The very day after the SAMS conclusion was reported in the press and Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion had gone missing from the Pentagon, and barely more than six weeks after Silverstein had set up a handsome insurance policy for the World Trade Center complex, the WTC and the Pentagon were hit by terrorist attacks. But the object that hit the Pentagon – allegedly a Boeing 757 piloted by a kamikaze Muslim whose flying skills had recently been deemed so poor that he was refused permission to rent a single-engine Cessna 172 without more lessons – did not simply crash his plane into the nearest side of the building. Instead, he chose to execute a 270 degree turn that would jeopardize the mission by rendering the attackers more vulnerable to ground defenses. This more complex maneuver would smash into a relatively lightly occupied section of the Pentagon, albeit one that according to some accounts included bookkeepers whom the perpetrators of the trillion-dollar embezzlement might want eliminated. The former option, which would be the obvious choice for a terrorist, would hit the side housing Rumsfeld’s office. All the evidence points to the fact that these attacks were carried out by Likudnik Zionist extremists aided by elements within the US government, employing hi-tech remote control technology to electronically hijack the planes from the ground, and framing Muslim patsies as “suicide hijackers” and “kamikaze pilots”.

    GWB: Stop … stop it, you genocidal, racist, fascist terrorist. Can’t you see that we are supposed to be the chosen ones, not the rest of you grasshoppers, crocodiles and beasts? Drag him across to the Oval Office, where I shall personally tear him limb from limb. Hee hee (wicked glint in eyes).

    5th Skeptic: But there is a problem with this story of where the passport was found. The alleged aircraft that the alleged suicide hijacker Satam al-Suqami was allegedly on – “AA Flight 11″ – hit the North Tower approaching from the north, and the wind was northwesterly, averaging about 15 mph at 1200 feet. Consequently, the passport should have ended up in Liberty Street to the south. The overpressure from a hydrocarbon deflagration would not have sufficed to reverse the 300 mph or more forward velocity of the passport, and after exiting the building, air resistance would cause the passport to decelerate and lose height before it could clear the buildings on the other side of Liberty Street. Isn’t it all too obvious that the scriptwriters made a blunder over the passport story? First they were going to say it was Mohammed Atta’s, then they decided to change it to Satam al-Suqami, as Atta had already gotten too much airplay. They then variously claimed “a few blocks away” and “Vesey Street”; unfortunately they got both guesses wrong. The amateur who concocted that part of the story forgot which plane Suqami was supposed to be on. And isn’t it rather odd that half of the so-called suicide hijackers and kamikaze pilots were found alive and well, weeks after the attacks?

    GWB: (Almost apoplectic with rage.) Take him out of sight, strap a dozen firecrackers round his neck and ignite them. Film it for me, I will enjoy seeing the pig meet a well-deserved end… (Calms down somewhat.) Now, back to the facts. We know it was bin Laden, because he admitted responsibility. Take a look at this video that we found in Jalalabad. (Cues aides to play video.)

    6th Skeptic: Wait a minute! The “Osama bin Laden” who is confessing bears little resemblance to the real one, and why did Osama praise two “suicide operatives” who had already turned up alive and well? In an analogy, if the administration really did have evidence that Saddam was attempting to obtain yellowcake from Niger, why did they need to forge a document that supposedly ‘proved’ so, and then when Joseph Wilson pointed out that it was a fake, take revenge by outing his wife Valerie (who used the name Plame) as a covert CIA agent? Similarly, if Osama really had confessed, they would not have needed to have the CIA forge a “confession video” that could then be conveniently ‘found’ amongst the many buildings in Jalalabad, featuring a paid actor playing the role of Osama. Moreover, Osama had already denied responsibility for the 9/11 attacks! In 2004, three years after he was reported to have died, bin Laden made a video that looked like it had been produced in a TV studio rather than a cave. And, if the government really had captured “Flight AA 77″ hitting the Pentagon they would have shown it, not spent months heavily processing footage from analog to digital and back and cherry-picking frames, until they could run their cover story of a few frames captured that were too inconclusive to reveal any incriminating evidence. And if any hijackers had been captured on camera at Boston, Dulles or Newark prior to boarding the 9/11 planes, the CIA would not have needed to rush out a badly faked forgery in July 2004, where the forgers could not even be bothered to get up early enough in the morning in order to have the light levels and shadows resemble those of half an hour after local sunrise in Washington on a September morning.

    GWB: (Starts choking on a pretzel and foaming at the mouth. Aides rush over as he starts to collapse, and carry him away.)

    Official White Horse Souse: The President will be okay in next to no time. But we know why Osama looks different on various videos. He decided to celebrate the successful attacks by spending his profits from speculating on airline, reinsurance, financial services and weapons options with a facelift. After realising that it didn’t make him better looking, he demanded a reversal and a refund.

    7th Skeptic: Are you kidding? All that, from a cave in Afghanistan whilst encircled by Nato forces. And isn’t it rather odd that he has never been caught, after more than five years? And that Muslims always seem to score 10/10 for executing brilliant military feats, outfoxing the mighty US Air Force, outwitting security cameras which are invariably Israeli-owned, speculating on options, having access to intelligence about the timing of wargames and exercises such as one involving an airliner crashing into one of the NRO’s towers in Chantilly that commenced at 9:00 a.m. on 9/11, and knowing how to turn off aircraft transponders, yet they score 0/10 for game theory when their efforts merely serve to furnish Zionists with the pretext they desire to attack and loot Islamic nations, whether to profit from opium trafficking or neuter some foe of Israel and plunder $8.8 billion worth of oil wealth because a president refuses to pay the Zionist Mafia’s protection fees.

    2nd Official White Horse Souse: It sounds a bit strange to me, too. But surely our leader wouldn’t lie about terrorism?

    7th Skeptic (again): Although there is one notable exception in Iran, almost all leaders are a bunch of lying, cheating, fawning, double-dealing, history-distorting, parallel-fornicating, genocidal, treasonous, dangerous sociopaths. In the US, the Israel lobby has so much control over Congress that even Jewish billionaire George Soros has suggested forming an alternative to AIPAC, although he is refusing to pony up the funds. Incidentally, the principals of the organization behind terror attacks such as 9/11 are psychopathic members of the Khazar tribe. These fake ‘Jews’ are Turkic Mongoloids, not Semites. Their latest atrocity, a holocaust in which up to 1 million Iraqis have perished in the last 4 years alone, demonstrates that they are the true anti-Semites. Iraqis – and the original Jews – are Semites.

    3rd Official White Horse Souse: We’re not all psychopathic monsters, you know. Maybe we should join you? As many are aware, the anthrax attacks were perpetrated by the government as a threat to potential whistleblowers in order to cow them into submission, if you’ll forgive the pun. The weapons-grade anthrax was found to be identical to the US army strain, indicating that it most likely originated at the US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick (USAMRIID), Maryland. With the crooks behind bars, we shall be free to co-operate with the prosecution.

    8th Skeptic: The crooks also made a mistake by failing to take the “partly evaporated” steel member from WTC 7 before Dr Jonathan Barnett got his hands on it. A bigger mistake was when an operative bungled the installation of ignition devices for the thermate-TH3 in the hollow WTC 2 impact-zone perimeter columns. As we saw, too much molten iron had collected at the bottom of a 3-story section of column and melted its way through too quickly at the NE corner of floor 81 on WTC 2, because the demolition team agents who had infiltrated Fuji Bank did not have access to floors 83 (IQ Financial Systems) and 84 (Euro Brokers). The yellow-orange molten iron could be observed pouring out the side of the building, much to the criminals’ dismay. Office fires do not bring down steel-framed high-rises, and they do not lead to pools of molten steel that persist for weeks on end, or partly evaporated steel members, or excessively sulfidated steel. However, these are indeed the unmistakeable fingerprints of thermate-based controlled demolitions, manufactured to create a “new Pearl Harbor” as the casus belli for wars against innocent Islamic nations.

    9th Skeptic: The conspiracy would not have needed anything like as many players as some government apologists assert. One alternative estimate suggested a mere 50 top specialists. And it appears that a number of participants in the Pentagon conspiracy whom the principals perceived as a risk were eliminated and claimed as having perished on the alleged “Flight 77″. The list included Charles Burlingame, a former Navy fighter pilot who used to work in the section of the Pentagon that was hit, and who had formulated a response for the eventuality of an airliner being flown into the Pentagon; Wilson “Bud” Flagg, a retired American Airlines pilot and Navy Admiral; Stanley Hall, a Raytheon employee; Bryan Jack, a senior Defense Department executive; Chandler Keller, a Boeing propulsion engineer; Barbara Olson, wife of a Solicitor General who pretended to have received cell phone calls from “Flight 77″; Ruben Ornedo, a Boeing satellite communications engineer; and Robert Penniger, an electrical engineer with BAE Systems. And we were supposed to believe that it was just another bizarre ‘coincidence’ that all these people just happened to be on a nearly empty flight. Give me an official conspiracy theorist, and I’ll show you someone who’s become detached from reality! Another dozen ‘Flight 77 passengers’ were linked to defense and government. If we add the four Raytheon employees supposedly killed on AA 11 such as Peter Gay, a Raytheon vice-president of operations for electronic systems, plus John O’Neill at the WTC, that’s up to 25 we can deduct from the list of conspirators who have to be kept quiet. The problem the crooks had with John O’Neill was that he was too honest and naive. He took them at their word, and if he had been allowed to continue his investigation, he would have realised that Osama, of all the bin Laden family who were business partners of the Bush clan, had been selected as a CIA asset to play the role of arch-villain because he was dying of kidney disease.

    10th Skeptic: The material we have presented is mostly fact, part hypothesis. When one has facts, conspiracy theory becomes conspiracy fact. Interrogation of the real suspects will help us to clarify the remaining unknowns. On the other hand, the 9/11 conspiracy theory promoted by the government has no facts in its favor. Planted passports, planted Korans, phony videos, ‘confessions’ obtained under duress or torture, unprecedented events that violate physical and natural law – these all count against the outrageous conspiracy theory featuring “suicidal Muslims” armed with box cutters. But it was the crooks’ long-standing control of the mass media that enabled them to get away with their crimes for so long. That had been a cornerstone of their program for over 100 years.

    4th Official White Horse Souse: (Puts hands up.) I’ll come quietly. Tell you what, let’s get Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Myers and Silverstein to swap places with the existing Guantanamo prisoners. Then, at least the interrogators would have suspects who possess information pertaining to terrorism. Finally, we have a briefing paper here that should be of interest to you. It was produced around the time of Hurricane Katrina.

    Bush’s Laws of Looting

    The First Law:

    A defenseless resource-rich country will remain in a state of rest or uniform progress unless an external force is applied.

    The Second Law:

    The degradation of a State of constant mass is proportional to the associated neglect or bombing campaign applied. We do not loot countries; we liberate them.

    The Third Law:

    Whenever resources allocated for one State’s protection are exerting a force upon a second State, the resultant resource deficit exerts an equally destructive force upon the first State in opposition to the intended effect. Since we oppose looting, any desperate starving masses commandeering food or drink are to be shot on sight.

    Source: http://www.takeourworldback.com/short/potusspeaks.htm

  2. algeria airlines Says:

    algeria airlines

    I Googled for something completely different, but found your page…and have to say thanks. nice read.

  3. algeria hotel Says:

    algeria hotel

    I Googled for something completely different, but found your page…and have to say thanks. nice read.

  4. terrorattacks Says:

    Nice To Read..Thanks..I have added you to my blogroll..
    Anyways,please don’t forget to read out my open letter to all Islamic terrorists at:
    http://terrorattacks.wordpress.com/
    & if you wish,you may add me to your blogroll..
    Thanks,again..

Leave a Reply