22 Jewish Leaders Arrested Calling for Removal of Iran at UN

April 24, 2007

 According the following article, More than one rabbi mentioned that Iran should be excluded from the international body because Ahmadinejad said that “Israel should be wiped off the map”. That actually was one zionist big fat lie. Ahmadinejad didn`t say that and here is the proof:

http://ahmedismailibrahim.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/ahmedinejad-misquoted-mistranslated/

Now, read what those rabbis said:

IsraelNN.com) Twenty-one rabbis, and a Jewish community layperson were arrested at the United Nations Tuesday, demanding that Iran be removed from the international body.

The group, organized by AMCHA – Coalition for Jewish Concerns, was arrested by New York City Police and imprisoned for several hours after peacefully crossing over from the public city street to the steps leading down to the United Nations.

AMCHA Director, and Rabbi of the Hebrew Institute of Riverdale, Avi Weiss stated in response to his incarceration, “It’s a serious matter to step beyond the line, to violate the law. But we must do so as a moral outcry to the world that it can’t be business as usual. The time has come to expel Iran from the United Nations.”

After being warned of their impending arrest, the group sat down under the large Peace Wall quoting the words of the biblical prophet Isaiah: “Nation shall not lift up sword against nation; neither shall they learn war any more.”

At the rally which began several blocks away at the Iranian Mission to the UN, Weiss exclaimed, “There’s a fire burning, and we must raise a voice of moral outrage. We urge that the presence of any Iranian delegation be protested, that pressure be put on countries not to trade with Iran, that state governments divest from companies trading with Iran, and that nations signed on to the Genocide Convention strongly condemn Iranian President Ahmadinejad who’s threatened to wipe Israel off the map.

“We demand that the United Nations expel Iran, which has threatened to annihilate Israel, a fellow UN member state.”

The group then proceeded to the headquarters of the World body, with the intent of getting arrested.

Former Deputy District Attorney, turned Conservative Rabbi, Mark Ankcorn, of the Southwest Orlando Jewish Congregation stated prior to his arrest, “It’s not a decision I take lightly, believe me. I’ve never written a letter to the editor, never written my congressman or my senator about any issue, never been a part of a sit-down or teach-in or anything else.

“But the government of Iran denies the Holocaust and supplies the rockets that killed dozens in Israel this past summer. They furiously seek nuclear weapons and kidnap British sailors. When will it stop? When will we stand up and say, Enough?”

Rabbi Joseph Potasnick, president of the New York Board of Rabbis, stated after the protest, “Iranian President Ahmadinejad says he’ll wipe Israel off the map. We say, remove the map from him — he should not be allowed to enter any halls of power anywhere. Ahmadinejad should be made to feel like a pariah.”

Conservative Rabbi Bruce Ginsburg of Congregation Sons of Israel added, “Iran trains terrorists to murder Israelis and insurgents to kill American soldiers and Iraqi civilians. We say to UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, kick Iran out of the United Nations.”

Each of the 22 arrested protestors were released after being held for over five hours, and were charged with disorderly conduct. Each of the protestors must appear in Criminal Court by May 15.

Following their release, organizers added, “We call upon the American Jewish community to organize a mass march on Washington, joined by hundreds of thousands, to raise a powerful voice of moral conscience and a simple message: there’s a fire burning, burning from Iran. There cannot be business as usual until Iran is stopped.”

“We are calling upon all rabbis and clergy of other faiths to join together and in an act of civil disobedience demand that Iran be expelled from the United Nations. To be successful in our mission, our actions need to be continuous and make a significant impact that will cause a shift around the world. On the week of Holocaust Remembrance Day, we, the leaders of our communities, will stand together and show the world that we will not tolerate Iran’s threats to the Jewish State, nor will we accept Iran’s defiance of nuclear treaties without being expelled from the UN.”

The Arrested Community Leaders
Rabbi Mark Ankcorn, Southwest Orlando Jewish Congregation
Rabbi Moses Birnbaum, President, Long Island Board of Rabbis
Rabbi Steven Burton, Congregation Shaarei Shalom
Rafi Farber, rabbinical student, Yeshivat Chovevei Torah   
Rabbi Jeffrey Fox  
Rabbi Avidan Freedman, Yeshivat Chovevei Torah
Rabbi Bruce Ginsburg, Congregation Sons of Israel
Ben Greenberg, rabbinical student, Yeshivat Chovevei Torah
Yehuda Hausman, rabbinical student, Yeshivat Chovevai Torah
Rabbi Jason Herman, Congregation Beth Israel/West Side Jewish Center
Rabbi David Kalb, CLAL
Rabbi Pinchas Klein, Mount Freedom Jewish Center, Morasha
Rabbi Aryeh Leifert, Congregation Rodfei Sholom, San Antonio, Texas
Rabbi Ronald Price, Congregation Netivot Sholom, UTJ/Morasha
Glenn Richter, Amcha-Coalition for Jewish Concerns
Rabbi Aaron Rubinger, Congregation Ohev Shalom, Orlando, FL
Ross Shapiro, rabbinical student, Yeshivat Chovevei Torah
Rabbi Uri Topolosky, Hebrew Institute of Riverdale
Rabbi Avi Weiss, Hebrew Institute of Riverdale
Rabbi Akiva David Weiss, Yeshivat Chovevei Torah
Rabbi David Willig, Bayside Jewish Center

Source: IsraelNationalNews.com


israel – the ‘state’ of perpetual denial

April 24, 2007

For a nation of people in a constant fit over other peoples’ ‘denials’, they sure get in a fair share of their own.

In the latest mind-boggling episode of what is clearly a perpetual state of denial, after admitting before the world that israel has what everyone knows it has, Olmert has the gall to DENY that he admitted it, while continuing to neither confirm nor deny that they actually have nuclear weapons.

Can it get any more twisted than that?

Let’s see – they DENIED firing the shells that killed beach-goers in Gaza, DENIED deliberately hitting the UN post, DENIED deliberately bombing civilians in Qana, DENIED using cluster bombs in Lebanon, after firing more than a million, DENIED deliberately targeting ambulances, and DENIED being on Lebanese soil when, clearly, they were.

They continue to DENY intentionally killing 19 people as they slept in Beit Hanun, and continue to DENY any aggressive intent during fly-by incidents with German and French peacekeepers in Lebanon.

All this is in real-time, right before our eyes.

Let’s not forget the USS Liberty, when they DENIED seeing the five-by-eight foot flag waving from the masthead before they bombed it – not once, but twiceeven after a second, larger flag was raised, killing 34 American servicemen and wounding 171.

I could go on – forever – but, why bother?

How many times will israelis DENY the obvious before the world realizes that israelis are habitual liars?

There is a REASON why no one in the world can stand a LIAR – LIARS CAN’T BE TRUSTED.

And there is a reason why LIARS LIE – because they consider themselves BETTER than everyone else and THAT is at the heart of all this darknessnot racism, but SUPREMACISM.

SUPREMACISTS have two sets of rules, one for themselves, and another for everyone else.

Source: WakeUpFromYourSlumber.


If You’re a Truther, Go and See Shooter

April 24, 2007

9/11, JFK parallel movie is packed with strong anti-government sentiment, feeds into mass awakening cultural zeitgeist.

Shooter, starring Mark Wahlberg, is the latest in a burgeoning trend of recent movies that carry a strong anti-government sentiment – the film is both political commentary and a damning expose of how the state stages black-ops in order to achieve political agendas.

The film centers around a character called Bob Lee Swagger, played by Mark Wahlberg, a Marine sniper who retires from the military after his friend is killed while fighting in Ethiopia.

The first scene shows the two targeting a convoy of armed militants and dispatching them via a long range high caliber sniper rifle in order to protect an American convoy. As more militants arrive, the mission becomes impossible and army command leaves Swagger and his friend for dead, citing the fact that they need to cover-up their illegal presence in the country. A helicopter then guns down Swagger’s friend but Swagger manages to bring down the chopper and survive.

36 months later we see Swagger at his isolated Wyoming mountain home where he lives alone with his dog. In one scene that will delight 9/11 truthers, a copy of the 9/11 Commission Report is clearly visible for extended periods in the shot as Swagger loads up his Internet while stating, “Let’s see what lies they are trying to sell us today.”

Swagger then receives a visit from Colonel Isaac Johnson (Danny Glover) who informs him that there is going to be an assassination attempt on the President and that Swagger’s expert sniper skills are required to determine in which city and from which location the shooting will take place.

Though stating his dislike for the President, “and the one before that,” Swagger reluctantly agrees to take on the scouting mission, eventually concluding that Philadelphia is to be where the assassination will take place.

Swagger is invited by the Colonel to be a spotter to help prevent the assassination from a building nearby to where the President is giving his speech. Immediately after the shot at the President is fired, a cop shoots Swagger twice, but he manages to jump through a window and escape. Though the actual victim of the assassination is the Archbishop of Ethiopia, Swagger is clearly being framed for the hit and the rest of the movie revolves around the government’s pursuit of Swagger and his attempt to find out who the men that recruited him were and what their real agenda is.

This movie is packed with positive messages about liberty, gun ownership and detailed examples of how government black-ops are run, how patsies are framed and how cover-stories are generated. Elements of how 9/11 was scripted along with the assassination of JFK are clearly used as parallels to map out the course of the plot.

The war in Iraq, Abu Ghraib and Big Brother are all critiqued as political commentary is woven into the story at every opportunity.

During his scouting mission in Washington DC, Baltimore and Philadelphia, Swagger is seen suspiciously eyeing the various surveillance cameras that watch him from every corner. The footage from these cameras is later used to frame Swagger for the assassination and is endlessly replayed by the news networks without question.

From 9/11 Blogger;

The film is literally an M.O. for false-flag black operations:

• JFK-like Oswald patsy frame-up: Wahlberg is tricked into thinking he is on a training exercise to figure out how a shooter could kill the president. The footage captured by CCTVs during this exercise is then shown to the media. Wahlberg (aka Oswald) is supposed to be killed by a policeman (aka Ruby) who later gets murdered himself to get rid of all leads.

• Evidence (Wahlberg’s gun) is planted.

• Compartmentalization is clearly laid out to show that even Wahlberg, whilst carrying out covert military operations on a need to know basis, was actually unknowingly part of a cover-up of a government-sponsored genocide in Africa.

• Top level elements of FBI and other agencies are in on it.

• Other notable quotes :

“Nothing, no matter how horrible, ever really happens without the approval of the government, over there and here. The problem isn’t the doing, the problem is that the people in power have to admit they knew. The prisoner are killed at Abu Ghraib but only the underlings go to jail. Their bosses knew. We know their bosses knew. But you don’t say it.”

At one point in the film, an officer asks Swagger: “Do we let America be ruled by thugs?” Replies Swagger: “Sure, some years we do.”

“There are no Democrats, Republicans, Sunnis or Shiites, just have and have-not’s.”

“It’s all about oil.”

Though you’ll see plenty of violence and things exploding, this is by no means a mindless action flick, the plot is intricate enough to keep you guessing until the very end while developments remain believable and consistent.

The movie clearly reflects a refreshing recent trend, the shift away from depicting government as our savior which was especially virulent after 9/11, replaced with a portrayal of the true nature of the state – covert, nefarious, ruthless and corrupt.

Response to the film has been mixed and poor in some quarters – critics have completely failed to understand that Shooter feeds directly into the the political and cultural zeitgeist of our time, and should be upheld as a fantastic example of how many Hollywood directors have vowed to devote their work in contribution to the mass awakening to the crimes of the state that is taking place worldwide.

“Now, apparently, the type of government-business conspiracy suggested in Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 9/11” has become so easy for viewers to accept that it can be incorporated into the plot of even a Mark Wahlberg shoot-’em-up without fear of antagonizing mainstream moviegoers,” laments one hack.

Shooter is in cinemas now and I urge all 9/11 truthers to go and see it.

Source: Prison Planet.


Why Does Counterpunch.org Deny US Government Complicity In The 911 Attacks?

April 24, 2007

Why does Counterpunch.org so vigorously deny US government foreknowledge and complicity in the 911 attacks?

We stumbled across this plausible explanation here, reposted verbatim below.

  1. The Manchurian Candidate Says:
    February 6th, 2007 at 9:17 pm Scientology is a government mind control program cleverly masquerading as a “religion” or “church.” It’s the ultimate capitalist religion: pay for self-improvement and spiritual advancement.Puzzle pieces:Google CIA+Mind Control+Scientology
    http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&q=CIA+%22mind+control%22+scientology

    The timeline of CIA mind control research, interrogation techniques, hypnosis, and forced hallucinogens and opiates begand with Project BLUEBIRD in 1951-1953. Project ARTICHOKE arose from Project BLUEBIRD in 1951. Project MKUltra began in 1953. Dianetics was published in 1952 by L. Ron Hubbard. Though Wikipedia has some decent writeups on each, the declassified documents confirm the existence of these sick projects.

    Google Scientology+ MKUltra; Scientology+Project Artichoke; Scientology+Project Bluebird
    http://www.google.com/search?as_q=scientology+MKUltra&hl=en&num=100
    http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&q=Scientology+%22project+artichoke%22
    http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&q=Scientology+%22project+bluebird%22

    A PBS documentary links Cheney and Rumsfeld to Project Artichoke via the death of a CIA MKUltra research scientist:

    http://www.google.com/search?as_q=cheney+rumsfeld&hl=en&num=100&as_epq=project+artichoke

    Save the above www pages, as they have a nasty habit of disappearing from the web and from Google’s cache.

    An interesting side note: there is a Scientology “Bunker” in Petrolia, CA, home of the (usually) hard-hitting Counterpunch.org.

    http://www.lermanet2.com/scientologynews/cst-petrolia-vault.htm
    http://weblogs.elearning.ubc.ca/leftcoastleaner/archives/2006/07/scientology_bun.html
    http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/petrolia.htm
    http://www.topix.net/forum/city/petrolia-ca/TGVO07L075LIU294M
    http://lermanet.com/idacamburn/chapter4.htm

    There are several other Scientology “bunkers” as well.

    Strangely enough, Alexander Cockburn one of its two main editors, has been very defensive of Scientology, and equally critical of people who correctly suspect US government foreknowledge and complicity in the 9-11 attacks. Why does Cockburn go so far to dismiss the overwhelming evidence of US government complicity in the 911 attacks?

    http://www.google.com/search?as_q=Counterpunch%2BScientology&hl=en&num=100&&as_epq=Alexander+Cockburn

    So, is Cockburn a Scientologist, is he simply under CIA mind control, or does he take $$$ from the “Church” of Scientology nearby, thus biasing his reporting?

    http://www.counterpunch.org/henderson08262006.html

    “Steal This Post” -Abbie Hoffman

Source: WakeUpFromYourSlumber.


Wolfowitz `gal pal’ scandal nothing compared to charges of treason

April 24, 2007

IT MADE THE NEWS when World Bank President Paul

 Wolfowitz was caught arranging a sweet deal for his mistress with World Bank funds, but the fact that Wolfowitz was once investigated for spying for a foreign government has kept under wraps by the mass media in America.
Those who make it their business to know about the doings of intriguers such as the big man at the World Bank recognize that Wolfowitz is a traitor who once engaged in espionage on behalf of Israel—and got away with it. However, the much bigger scandal, dating back to 1978, has never been plastered across the front pages of newspapers or slavered over by grinning media personalities.
While the employees of the World Bank are up in arms and have publicly hissed him and called for his ouster, Wolfowitz is still hanging on at the World Bank with the support of the Israel-controlled Bush administration.
That many are reveling in the scandal surrounding Wolfowitz is not surprising. Not only is Wolfowitz a “neo-con” (that is, one of the famous neo-conservatives) but he is also, as brash commentator Maureen Dowd has noted, a “con,” in the classic sense of the word: a con-man, a crook, evidenced by his influence-peddling on behalf of his mistress. However, in addition, one might suggest, Wolfowitz should also be considered a “con” in another sense of the word: short for “convict”—as in prison convict, which is where Wolfowitz might have ended up if he had been charged with spying for Israel as some federal agents believe he is guilty of having done.
For many years, Wolfowitz has engaged in dubious affairs on behalf of the interests of Israel. Like many others in his circle of friends and political associates, Wolfowitz—both in private life, as a well-paid academic between stints in government, and in government, most lately as number two man in the Defense Department under the unlamented Donald Rumsfeld— was a key player at the highest level in a relentless, well-funded and carefully orchestrated campaign of lies and disinformation—acting in concert with Israeli intelligence and the Israeli lobby in America—to embroil the United States in the war against Iraq. Many call Wolfowitz a “war criminal.” At the very least, he’s a liar.

“Forget about Wolfowitz and his mistress. But don’t forget about Wolfowitz and his spying for Israel.”

But Wolfowitz, as we’ve seen, can also be pondered as a possible traitor—if then-ranking people in our FBI and the Justice Department were to be believed.

Back in 1978, Wolfowitz was under investigation, as an official of the U.S. Arms Control & Disarmament Agency, for having passed a classified U.S. document to an Israeli government official.

The purloined material related to the proposed sale of U.S. weapons to an Arab government, something always of concern to fanatic Israeli loyalists like Wolfowitz, who, although American born, has always placed Israel’s needs first and foremost in his policymaking ventures.

Wolfowitz utilized the good offices of an operative of the pro-Israel lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, as the intermediary in handing over the stolen document to Wolfowitz’s friends in Israel (where, by the way, his sister lives).

It is this same AIPAC that, even now, is in the midst of a nasty criminal spy scandal relating, once again, to the illegal acquisition of classified U.S. defense information. Two former top AIPAC officials will soon stand trial in federal court for their pro-Israel misdeeds.

In any event, although Wolfowitz was never prosecuted for espionage, that doesn’t mean that there wasn’t evidence to indict him.

Several long-time close Wolfowitz associates (all now-infamous “neo-conservative” armchair intriguers for Israel)—ranging from Richard Perle to Stephen Bryen to Michael Ledeen to Douglas Feith, who served as Wolfowitz’s deputy in the Defense Department— have all been under FBI scrutiny at one time or another on suspicion of espionage on behalf of Israel.

It often surprises many Americans, who hear in the media that Israel is such a great ally of the United States, to learn that there are good patriotic Americans in the FBI who don’t like the idea of American public officials, like the aforementioned neo-conservatives, passing classified defense material to this dubious ally.

None of these neo-cons was ever indicted. However, in the case of Bryen, one dedicated federal prosecutor (who happened to be Jewish) pushed hard to indict Bryen, only to have the Israeli lobby put pressure on the Reagan administration to force the Justice Department (ruled by a series of notably corrupt and Israeli-influenced attorneys general during the Reagan years) to abandon the Bryen investigation.

Forget about Wolfowitz and his mistress. Don’t forget about Wolfowitz and his spying for Israel.

Source: The Piper Report.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.