Wolfowitz scandal harmed World Bank

April 27, 2007

World Bank officials have voiced deep concern over the impact to their work from the crisis surrounding the bank’s embattled chief Paul Wolfowitz. In a letter to Wolfowitz and the bank’s executive board, a group of 32 officials said they could no longer credibly implement the bank’s anti-corruption strategy.

The letter also called for a clear and decisive action to be taken.

It was the clearest sign yet that the controversy sparked by Wolfowitz’s approval of a promotion and a large pay increase for his female friend was affecting the bank’s operations around the globe.

“The credibility of our front line staff is eroding in the face of legitimate questions from our clients about the bank’s ability to ‘practice what it preaches’ on governance,” the letter said.

The letter follows calls by the bank’s staff association for Wolfowitz to step down over his handling of the promotion for Shaha Riza, before she was posted by the bank to the State Department because of their relationship.

In their letter, the group said the crisis was a critical test of the bank’s own commitment to good governance.

DB/DB

Source: Press TV.


Weekly Report on Human Rights Violations in The Occupied Palestinian Territory

April 27, 2007

Report, Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, 26 April 2007

Palestinian students hold a memorial for their classmate, Bushra Bargheesh who was killed the day before by Israeli special forces at her home in the Jenin Refugee Camp in the West Bank, April 23, 2007. (Raed Abu Baker/MaanImages)

Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) Continue Systematic Attacks on Palestinian Civilians and Property in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT)

  • Nine Palestinians, including two children, were killed by IOF in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
  • Four of the victims were extrajudicially executed by IOF.
  • Eighteen civilians were wounded by IOF gunfire in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
  • Thirteen of these civilians, including a journalist, four women and four international human rights defenders, were wounded when IOF used force to disperse a peaceful demonstration against the construction of the Annexation Wall in Bal’ein village near Ramallah.
  • Two children were wounded as a result of the explosion of a mysterious object of the remainders of IOF.
  • IOF conducted 30 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank.
  • IOF arrested 44 Palestinian civilians, including eight children and a girl.
  • IOF transformed a Palestinian house into a military site.
  • IOF have continued to impose a total siege on the OPT.
  • IOF positioned at various checkpoints and border crossings in the West Bank arrested six Palestinian civilians.
  • IOF have continued settlement activities in the West Bank.
  • IOF demolished a house in occupied Jerusalem.
  • IOF demolished seven houses to the south of Hebron, rendering 48 Palestinians homeless.
  • Israeli settlers moved back to the evacuated “Homseh” settlement near Nablus.
  • Israeli settlers have continued to occupy a house in Hebron for the fifth consecutive week.
  • Read the full report: ElectronicIntifada.net


    Children of U.S. occupation

    April 27, 2007

    What has Bush brought for the children of Iraq?

    Four years of occupation in Iraq has not only crippled the country but also set the scene for what we can see today of innocent children scavenging in garbage dumps to find something with what they could pass the day.

    The appalling condition of many Iraqi children victimized by the U.S. occupation has become too emotive an issue for even American mass media to ignore.

    Recently a report by CNN showed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children in rags and no longer attending school. Iraqi hospitals are also too strapped with casualties to deal with mental toll on children. According to Iraqi health officials, bomb blasts, gunfire, and killings of family members have plagued Iraq and unfortunately it is the Iraqi children that suffer the most.

    The U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq has plunged Iraq into a complete quagmire and causing widespread poverty. Iraqi children are most vulnerable, and in Baghdad and other Iraqi cities, children can often be seen rummaging through heaps of rubbish, trying to find scraps of food just to survive.

    It is difficult to give an exact figure of how much the war and violence has affected the lives of Iraqi children.

    The humanitarian organization Save the Children, in a report last year about children in conflict zones, estimated that 818,000 Iraqi children, ranging from 6 to 11 in age, were not in school. That’s roughly one in every five Iraqi children in that age group.

    The war in Iraq has disrupted normal life, forcing millions of Iraqi families to flee their homes, and separating many children from their families.

    Studies by the World Health Organization show primary-school-age children have experienced major traumatic events, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) since the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion and the country’s subsequent occupation.

    This is truly deplorable; taking into account that Iraq has the second largest proven oil reserves in the world, and should be one of the richest countries in the Middle East. Interesting; maybe that is why the country was occupied ….

    The Bush administration, which invaded Iraq under the slogan of saving the Iraqi people from the tyranny of the then dictator, Saddam Hussein, now seems oblivious to the plight of Iraqi civilians, and children in particular.

    It is crystal clear for the entire world that Bush, named “the Liar of the Year 2006″ by Newsweek, only wants to plunder Iraq’s natural resources. The Bush regime is quietly plundering Iraqi oil, and the corruption and insecurity in Iraq, fanned by the American military occupation, is facilitating this process.

    The Iraqi government is under immense pressure to restore peace and security to the occupation-torn country, but this is an impossible task as long as the Bush regime defies American and world public opinion, by refusing to withdraw its forces from Iraq.

    The fact of the matter is that President Bush’s urge for surge is really designed to facilitate the plunder of Iraq’s crude oil reserves.

    Nevertheless, on the one hand, western media reports the dreadful situation going on in Iraq ad nauseam. However, on the other hand, it seldom asks who is to be held accountable for such a humanitarian disaster.

    The humanitarian disaster in Iraq will undoubtedly exacerbate if, and only if, the Bush-headed U.S. occupation of Iraq continues.

    Source: Press TV.


    Pentagon Confirms: Bush Hyped False Iraq Deadline

    April 27, 2007

    The Associated Press has a major story out confirming that President Bush has been hyping a false Iraq spending deadline.

    For weeks, the Bush administration has been trying to force Congress to abandon its support for an Iraq withdrawal timeline by claiming that a “clean” Iraq spending bill must be signed by mid-April or U.S. troops will suffer. In one speech, President Bush warned Congress that “the clock is ticking for our troops in the field“:

    BUSH: Congress continues to pursue these [withdrawal] bills, and as they do, the clock is ticking for our troops in the field. Funding for our forces in Iraq will begin to run out in mid-April. Members of Congress need to stop making political statements, and start providing vital funds for our troops.

    Days later, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS) released a report showing that the Army actually has enough money in its existing budget to operate through June. But Bush and his Iraq allies wouldn’t accept it. Here’s Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on Fox on 4/1/07:

    FOX: So, Senator McConnell, is this talk about an April deadline for getting the funding bill to the president, is that something of a scare tactic?

    MCCONNELL: Well, the problem is CRS is wrong.

    But now, the AP reports, the CRS numbers have been confirmed by the Pentagon:

    The Pentagon says it has enough money to pay for the Iraq war through June, despite warnings from the White House that troops are being harmed by Congress’ failure to quickly deliver more funds.

    The Army is taking a series of “prudent measures” aimed at making sure delays in the bill financing the war do not harm troop readiness, according to instructions sent to Army commanders and budget officials April 14.

    President Bush can’t even fear-monger right these days.

    Source: Think Progress.


    Wolfowitz Rewarded Iraq War Allies With Key Positions At World Bank

    April 27, 2007

    wolfowitz.jpg

    In an attempt to diffuse the growing controversy surrounding his tenure at the World Bank, Paul Wolfowitz asked his critics not to associate him with his previous position of having led the nation into the Iraq war:

    For people who disagree with the things they associate with me in my previous job, I am not in my previous job. I am not working for the U.S. government. I’m working for this institution and its 185 shareholders.

    But Wolfowitz has allowed his previous position to influence his management at the World Bank. He secured an exorbitant salary for his girlfriend Shaha Riza, who “reinforced Wolfowitz’s resolve” to invade Iraq. Moreover, of five top Bank officials appointed by Wolfowitz, three were senior political appointees of governments that provided strong backing for U.S. policy in Iraq:

    Marwan Muasher, senior vice president for external affairs: “The former Jordanian Deputy Prime Minister Muasher served as King Abdullah II’s ambassador in Washington in the run-up to the Iraq War in 2002 and reportedly played a key role in ensuring Amman’s cooperation in the March 2003 invasion.”

    Jose Daboub, managing director: As chief of staff to former Salvadorian President Francisco Flores, Daboub helped secure deployment of “400 Salvadoran combat troops to Iraq, more than any other developing country” in 2003. Daboub has vigorously defended the World Bank’s decision to send more officials to lend in Iraq.

    Ana Palacio, chief general counsel: As former foreign minister of Spain, Palacio was “an outspoken proponent of the U.S.-led Iraq invasion, and helped secure 1,500 Spanish troops to Iraq. Lauded by the U.S. State Department for her pre-war support, Palacio believed that Iraq was “deceiving the international community” and harbored weapons of mass destruction.

    In February, the Government Accountability Project learned that Wolfowitz was “negotiating a contract with a new resident Iraq Country Director,” suggesting that “Wolfowitz intends to expand Bank-funded projects there dramatically in the future,” despite the presence of massive corruption and “no functioning banking system” to secure those loans.

    Among World Bank staff, “it has been noted that Mr. Wolfowitz’s passion for fighting corruption, which he has said saps economic life from the world’s poorest nations, seemed to evaporate when it came to reviewing lending to Iraq.”

    Source: Think Progress.


    Bush: If You Judge My Iraq Strategy By The Number Of Violent Attacks, The Terrorists Win

    April 27, 2007

    In an interview last night on PBS, President Bush complained that people who measure progress in Iraq by how many car bombs and suicide attacks occur are giving a “huge victory” to the enemy by making it more difficult for him to promote the war to the American public.

    “If the standard of success is no car bombings or suicide bombings,” Bush said, “we have just handed those who commit suicide bombings a huge victory.” He repeated later that people who “judge the administration’s [escalation] plan” based on such acts of violence “have just given Al Qaida or any other extremist a significant victories [sic].”

    Bush said that these images of brutal violence on television are “one of the problems I face in trying to convince the American people” that the war is worthwhile.

    Another reason President Bush doesn’t want to talk about suicide bombings: they’ve increased 30 percent over the past six weeks despite the escalation, according to U.S. military data.

    Source: Think Progress.


    John Mccain Makes Jokes About War in Iraq

    April 27, 2007

    On Tuesday’s Daily Show, Jon Stewart asked Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) about his notorious recent shopping trip at a Baghdad market. McCain responded, “I had something picked out for you, too — a little IED to put on your desk.”

    Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) last night blasted McCain’s comment, calling it “outrageous” that he would “joke about IEDs when our kids are getting blown up!”

    This morning on ABC’s Good Morning America, McCain called Murtha a hysteric. “I don’t know how to react to that kind of hysteria to a comedy show. All I’m going to say to Murtha and others. … Lighten up and get a life.

    When he recently faced criticism over his “Bomb bomb Iran” song, McCain similarly responded, “Lighten up and get a life.” Hardly a surprise from someone who thinks it’s “fun” to “misspeak” about the war.

    If you want to watch the video of Murtha and Mccain visit the source of this story which is:

    http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/26/mccain-life/


    Fox News Sinks To New Low, Repeatedly Reports Parody Story As Actual News- (Fox Makes Fun of a hate crime against Islam)

    April 27, 2007

    On Tuesday, Fox News morning show “Fox & Friends” aired at least eight segments on a purported “news” story that was actually a parody article written by a publication similar to The Onion.

    The backstory: Last week in the town of Lewiston, Maine, a group of Somalian Muslim middle school students were the subject of a cruel prank when their peers placed a ham steak next to them in order to personally offend the students. School officials filed a report because the students considered the act to be a hate/bias crime.

    This actual story was then spoofed by a parody site called Associated Content, which made up quotes and details, such as the school’s intention to “create an anti-ham ‘response plan.’”

    On Tuesday, Fox & Friends reported these parody quotes and details as actual news. Poking fun at the students, hosts asked whether ham was “a hate crime…or lunch?” and showed screen shots of ham sandwiches, starving Somalians, belching, animal noises, and mock “reenactments” of the incident. Ironically, the hosts assured viewers several times, “We’re not making this up!”

    Fox’s careless blunder made news in the town and “launched an immediate avalanche of angry phone calls and ugly e-mails to the school system.”

    In the parody, the ham steak became a ham sandwich. Fake quotes were attributed to Superintendent Leon Levesque, Stephen Wessler of the Center for the Prevention of Hate Violence, and one of the Somali students targeted in the incident. […]

    Following the Fox broadcast, Levesque’s office received dozens of angry phone calls and profanity-laced e-mails, made and sent by people all over the country
    , who charge the school district overreacted to what they believed from news reports to be a ham sandwich tossed at a Somali student. […]

    “Fox has figured out, from the calls we’ve gotten, that they’ve made a big mistake,” Wessler said.

    “This is a wake-up call that the level of hate and anger, among a small population, is vibrant,” he added.

    Levesque said he was bothered not only that the parody took aim at a sensitive issue in Lewiston, but also that Fox and others reported the information as fact without checking. The national media, Levesque said, sees information posted online and “uses it as gospel.”

    We’ve long known Fox News’ reporting was parody, but reporting parody news is a new low.

    Source: Think Progress.


    Hillary Clinton: America Will Suffer Another 9/11 After The Next President Sworn in

    April 27, 2007

    So, are they planning for another 9/11? Are they going to blame Muslims for it as they always do?

    According to a Time article, Hilary said that the U.S. will probably suffer a terrorist attack on the scale of 9/11 after the next President is sworn in — and that Hillary is the only Democratic candidate capable of handling such a crisis because of her Senate Armed Services Committee tenure and her years in the White House.

    So, they now horrify their people to vote for them? This is so cheesy.


    “Five Years of My Life”- Former Guantanamo Detainee Tells His Story

    April 27, 2007

    The United States reportedly paid Pakistani police some $3,000 for Murat Kurnaz before they locked him away for nearly five years without charges in Guantanamo. The German-Turkish man has written a book about his plight in the world’s most famous prison.“I understood a long time ago what this prison was about,” Kurnaz writes in “Five Years of My Life,” his memoir that hit the shelves of Germany’s book stores earlier this week. “They could do with us whatever they wanted.”

    Kurnaz, a 24-year-old Turkish national born and raised in Germany, was arrested in Pakistan shortly after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001; the Americans parked him in a secret prison in Kandahar, where Kurnaz — prisoner No. 53 — says he saw and experienced horrific things.

    One night, screams woke Kurnaz. He said he saw two soldiers beat a man on the ground.

    “I could see that he had a blanket wrapped around his head. They beat his head with a butt, and kicked him in the stomach. Other guards and soldiers joined in beating the man. It was seven soldiers,” he wrote.

    The next morning, the man was dead.

    Kurnaz himself was repeatedly electrocuted when interrogated, he said, and he was left for days at a time to hang by his hands, which were tied to his back. In one incident, Kurnaz caught a glimpse of another detainee hanging across the room.

    “I don’t know him … His body is swollen and blue. Only in a few spots, it is white,” Kurnaz writes. “I think the man is dead. He looks like someone who has frozen to death in the snow.”

    In another terrible interrogation, Kurnaz’s said, his head was pushed under water, a practice dubbed waterboarding. Kurnaz feared for his life.

    “I would have told them everything,” he remembers. “But what should I tell them?”

    Kurnaz has been at the center of a diplomatic affair involving Germany and the United States; at the age of 19, only a few weeks after Sept. 11, Kurnaz had left Bremen, northern Germany, for Pakistan, where he claims he wanted to study Islam and work for an Islamic group helping the homeless. He didn’t tell his family about his trip because “my mother wouldn’t have let me go.”

    His friend who wanted to travel with him was held back at the airport because of a fine he hadn’t paid. Kurnaz went by himself. On the day he wanted to fly back home, Dec. 1, 2001, Kurnaz was hauled off a bus by Pakistani police, who handed him over to the Americans. After he was parked in Kandahar, Kurnaz was transported to the U.S. military Guantanamo prison in Cuba.

    There, he recounts, the suffering continued. Kurnaz remembers how he was put in a tiny cage and repeatedly beaten. Kurnaz said he spent roughly a year in solitary confinement, suffering from sleep deprivation, extreme cold and heat, and oxygen deprivation.

    Kurnaz has several harrowing tales to tell about the military prison. One involves Abdul Rahman, a young man from Saudi Arabia who guards continued to beat to the ground after U.S. military doctors had amputated both his legs and left the wounds festering in the sun, he claims.

    Kurnaz said Abdul Rahman was a freshly married man who liked soccer. When he was beaten, “he never cried,” Kurnaz writes. “But when he heard or saw how other prisoners were beaten in their cages, he loudly cried. Although he was treated so inhumanely, he had empathy for other people.”

    Abdul Rahman is still in Guantanamo, Kurnaz writes.

    The former detainee has made more harsh allegations. Broken bones were never treated, and when one inmate agreed to have one of his fingers amputated because it was frozen dead, U.S. doctors simply amputated all of them — except for his two thumbs.

    The case of Kurnaz has also troubled Berlin: When the Pentagon in September 2002 offered to release the seemingly harmless inmate to Germany, the government in Berlin refused because it deemed Kurnaz a security risk. Moreover, Germans were directly involved with his plight: German elite soldiers, Kurnaz claims, beat his head to the ground in Kandahar (he has identified one German soldier, who denies having abused Kurnaz), and a team of German intelligence officials visited him in Guantanamo. After initial denials, Berlin admitted that the Germans interrogated Kurnaz in Cuba.

    A high-profile parliamentary inquiry is currently probing whether the former German government could be held responsible for prolonging the man’s stay in Guantanamo.

    Kurnaz’s graphic and — according to several sources — accurate account of his plight as a terror suspect in Guantanamo may elevate the pressure on Berlin and Washington. It wasn’t until last summer, when freshly elected Chancellor Angela Merkel intervened with U.S. President George W. Bush, that Kurnaz was released.

    Observers say Kurnaz simply was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Yet even if the man, who now wears a long beard that grew during his imprisonment, was indeed a security threat (U.S. and German courts have ruled he isn’t), it doesn’t justify the repeated acts of abuse and torture he and his fellow inmates allegedly had to endure.

    Several governments have urged Washington to close Guantanamo; classified as enemy combatants, the detainees are held without charges and without a trial. Although the treatment of detainees in Guantanamo has reportedly improved since the early months, the detainment camp itself remains a subject of fierce debate.

    The question that remains is: Will the officials responsible for the abuse allegedly committed at Guantanamo be held accountable?

    Shortly before Kurnaz was flown to freedom at Ramstein Air Base in Germany, a U.S. officer gave him a piece of paper, telling him to sign it, to admit “that you were detained in Guantanamo Bay because you are linked to al-Qaida and the Taliban. Or you are never going home.”

    Kurnaz didn’t sign it. Today, he lives in Bremen. He says he is happy.

    Source: International Intelligence.