Report: U.S. Hits “Militants’ Somali” Base

June 2, 2007

 

At least one U.S. warship bombarded a remote, mountainous village in Somalia where Islamic “militants” had set up a base, officials in the northern region of Puntland said Saturday.

The attack from a U.S. destroyer took place late Friday, said Muse Gelle, the regional governor. The “extremists” had arrived Wednesday by speedboat at the port town of Bargal.

Gelle said the area is a dense thicket, making it difficult for security forces from the semiautonomous republic of Puntland to intervene on their own.

A local radio station quoted Puntland’s leader, Ade Muse, as saying that his forces had battled with the “extremists” for hours before U.S. ships arrived and used their cannons. Muse said five of his troops were wounded, but that he had no information about casualties among the “extremists”.

A task force of coalition ships, called CTF-150, is permanently based in the northern Indian Ocean and patrols the Somali coast in hopes of intercepting international terrorists. U.S. destroyers are normally assigned to the task force and patrol in pairs.

CNN International, quoting a Pentagon official, also reported the U.S. warship’s involvement. A Pentagon spokesman told The Associated Press he had no information about the incident.

“This is a global war on terror and the U.S. remains committed to reducing terrorist capabilities when and where we find them,” Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said.

“We recognize the importance of working closely with allies to seek out, identify, locate, capture, and if necessary, kill terrorists and those who would provide them safe haven,” Whitman said. “The very nature of some of our operations, as well as the success of those operations is often predicated on our ability to work quietly with our partners and allies.”

At an international conference in Singapore, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates told reporters who asked about the Somalia reports on Saturday, “Frankly, I don’t know exactly what was going on. I’ve been on the road. And I wouldn’t be commenting on operational activities anyway.”

Puntland’s minister of information, Mohamed Abdulrahman Banga, told the AP that the “extremists” arrived heavily armed in two fishing boats from southern Somalia, which they controlled for six months last year before being routed by Ethiopian troops sent to prop up a faltering Somali government.

“They had their own small boats and guns. We do not know exactly where they came from – maybe from Ras Kamboni, where they were cornered in January,” he said.

Local fishermen, contacted by telephone, said about a dozen fighters arrived Wednesday, but Puntland officials said the number could be as high as 35.

The United States has repeatedly accused Somalia’s Council of Islamic Courts of harboring international terrorists linked to al-Qaida and allegedly responsible for the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

The U.S. sent a small number of special operations troops with the Ethiopian forces that drove the Islamic forces into hiding. U.S. warplanes have carried out at least two airstrikes in an attempt to kill suspected al-Qaida members, Pentagon officials have said.

In Mogadishu, unknown gunmen killed a government official, Hassan Ali Sa’id, in the capital’s southern neighborhood late Saturday as he was about to enter his house. Sa’id was district commissioner of the Howlwadaag area.

“We heard two shots and we came out and we saw our neighbor lying in the street and a car disappearing,” said Sa’id Ahmed Yonis.

Sa’id is the second district commissioner killed in Mogadishu in the past month.

Source: PeoplePC


Weekly Report: on Israeli human rights violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (24- 30 May, 2007)

June 2, 2007

 

Gaza, (Palestinian Centre for Human Rights):

Weekly Report: On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory No. 21/2007 – 24 – 30 May 2007

Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) Continue Systematic Attacks on Palestinian Civilians and Property in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), Especially in the Gaza Strip

19 Palestinians, including 3 civilians, were killed by IOF in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

2 of the victims were extra-judicially executed by IOF in the West Bank.

12 of the victims were killed by IOF air strikes on the Gaza Strip.

67 Palestinians, mostly civilians, were wounded by IOF gunfire in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

54 of these Palestinians were wounded by IOF gunfire in the Gaza Strip.

IOF have shelled various areas in the Gaza Strip.

IOF launched 46 missiles at civilian and paramilitary targets.

5 civilian facilities, one house and a number of paramilitary sites were destroyed.

Dozens of houses and civilian facilities were damaged.

IOF conducted 56 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank, and one into Khan Yunis in the Gaza Strip.

IOF arrested 79 Palestinian civilians in the West Bank, including 2 ministers, 4 members of the Palestinian Legislative Council, 9 mayors and 4 members of municipal councils.

IOF arrested 2 Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip.

IOF stormed offices of 6 charities and cultural centers in the West Bank.

IOF have continued to impose a total siege on the OPT.

IOF have cut off the Gaza Strip from the outside world.

IOF positioned at various checkpoints and border crossings in the West Bank arrested 12 Palestinian civilians, including a child and physically disabled one.

IOF have continued settlement activities in the West Bank.

IOF demolished 6 houses in Jerusalem and Hebron allegedly for havening been constructed without licenses.

Summary

IOF escalated violations of international law and humanitarian law continued in the OPT during the reporting period (24 – 30 May 2007):

Killing: During the reporting period, IOF killed 17 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Two other Palestinians, including a woman, died from previous wounded. In addition, IOF wounded 54 Palestinians, mostly civilians, including 6 children and 8 women and 2 paramedics, in the Gaza Strip, and 13 civilians, including 2 children and an a journalist, in the West Bank.

In the Gaza Strip, IOF killed 12 Palestinians, including 2 civilians, whereas 2 others, including a woman, died from previous wounds. In addition, 54 Palestinians, mostly civilians, including 6 children, 8 women and 2 paramedics, were wounded. IOF continued air strikes on civilian facilities, sites of resistance groups and civilian vehicles believed to be transporting members of the Palestinian resistance. During to the reporting period, IOF launched 46 missiles at several targets in the Gaza Strip. In addition to deaths and casualties incurred by these attacks, 5 civilian facilities, a house and a number of paramilitary sites mostly belonging to Hamas and the Executive Force of the Palestinian Ministry of Interior were destroyed. Dozens of houses and civilian facilities, including PCHR’s branch office in Jabalya refugee camp, were also damaged. IOF demonstrated a flagrant disregard to the lives of the Palestinian civilian population as they attacked densely populated area while pursing members of the Palestinian resistance. Since the beginning of this latest offensive against the Gaza Strip, IOF have killed 52 Palestinians, including 7 children and a woman, and have wounded 174 others, mostly civilians, including 24 children, 18 women, 2 paramedics and 2 journalists.

In the West Bank, IOF killed 5 Palestinians and wounded 13 civilians, including 2 children, a woman and a journalist. On 26 May 2007, IOF killed 2 Palestinian militants and a civilian bystander in Jabal al-Mukabber neighborhood in the southeast of Jerusalem. The two militants exchanged fired with IOF soldiers. On 29 May 2007, IOF undercover units committed 2 extra-judicial executions in Ramallah and Jenin, which killed a member of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades (an armed wing of Fatah movement) and another of the al-Quds Brigades (the armed wing of the Islamic Jihad), and wounded 5 civilian bystanders.

On 25 May 2007, 5 Palestinian civilians, including a journalist, were wounded when IOF used force against a peaceful demonstration organized in protest to the construction of the Annexation Wall in Bal’ein village, west of Ramallah. On 28 May 2007, 2 Palestinian children were wounded by the IOF gunfire in Jericho. On 29 May 2007, a Palestinian was wounded by the IOF gunfire in Tulkarm refugee camp.

Incursions: During the reporting period, IOF conducted at least 56 military incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank. During those incursions, IOF waged arrest campaigns that targeted public figures affiliated to Hamas and Fatah movements. IOF arrested 79 Palestinian civilians, including 2 ministers, 4 members of the Palestinian Legislative Council, 9 mayors and 4 members of municipal councils. Most of the arrests took place on Thursday, 24 May 2007. Thus, the number of Palestinians arrested by IOF in the West Bank since the beginning of this year has mounted to 1,300. Additionally, IOF stormed offices of 6 charities and cultural centers.

In the Gaza Strip, on 29 May 2007, IOF moved into al-Fukhari area in the southeast of Khan Yunis. They killed 2 Palestinian militants, wounded a woman and arrested 2 brothers.

Restrictions on Movement: IOF have continued to impose a tightened siege on the OPT and imposed severe restrictions on the movement of Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem. On Tuesday, 22 May 2007, IOF imposed a total closure on the OPT for the Jewish Shavuot.

Gaza Strip

IOF have imposed a strict siege on the Gaza Strip. They have closed its border crossings as a form of collective punishment against Palestinian civilians.

IOF have closed Rafah International Crossing Point since 25 June 2006, even though they do not directly control it. During the reporting period, the crossing point was reopened on 3 sporadic days. IOF have partially reopened commercial crossings, especially al-Mentar (Karni) crossing, but many goods and medical supplies have been lacked in markets in the Gaza Strip. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip have been prevented from traveling through this crossing. IOF have allowed international workers to pass through the crossing. With this closure, only few Palestinian patients have been able to travel to hospitals in Israel and the West Bank. In addition, IOF have continued to impose severe restriction on fishing in the Gaza Strip.

West Bank

IOF have tightened the siege imposed on Palestinian communities in the West Bank. They have isolated Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank. Contrary to Israeli claims, IOF positioned at various checkpoints in the West Bank have continued to impose severe restrictions on the movement of Palestinian civilians. IOF also erected more checkpoints on the main roads and intersections in the West Bank. During the reporting period, IOF soldiers positioned at various checkpoints and border crossings in the West Bank arrested at least 12 Palestinian civilians, including a child and a physically disabled one.

Settlement Activities: IOF have continued settlement activities in the OPT in violation of international humanitarian law have continued to attack Palestinian civilians and property. During the reporting period, IOF demolished 4 houses in Jerusalem and 2 others in Hebron, claiming that they were built without licenses.
http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/news/news.php?article=12845


Why is Islam so feared and derided today?

June 2, 2007

“Muslims [today] are hated, not for their vices, but for their virtues.”
Reprinted from WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
Written by Ian Buckley

Professor Hugh Kenner – with whom I had the honour of corresponding shortly before his death – considered that without its poets the world would have already have long since succumbed to total exhaustion.

More practically, perhaps, we can view religion as playing a similar
valuable role in preserving traditional societies, and maintaining
higher values than the almighty dollar. But not all faiths have ‘what
it takes’ to resist the trend towards a world turned into a counting
house on top of a rubbish dump.

Indeed, both Judaism and the Protestant variant of Christianity are
implicated, more or less, in the rise of capitalism. Additionally,
traditionalist Catholics believe that their Church is now a shadow of
its former state, having virtually self-destructed after Vatican II.
While Eastern Orthodoxy and even Japanese Shinto play their honourable
part in resisting the rush towards a porno-trash non-culture, it is
pre-eminently Islam that is the biggest stumbling block in the way of
the New World Order.

In the first place Islam is a profoundly and genuinely democratic
faith, as opposed to the `democracy’ of fakery and computerised
trickery that characterised the election of Bush and Bliar. Following
on from this, Muslims also hold true to economic democracy in the form
of the prohibition of usury. Though now abandoned, this was also once
a doctrine of the Christian Church. Such a fundamental point is, to
say the least, unappreciated by the false prophets of globalist
capitalism, always on the lookout for fresh lands to reduce to a bland
and hence profitable mass – or mess.

When Muslims, like those `extremist’ Iranians, reject the societies
(perhaps non-societies might be a better term) of Britain and the US,
are they really wrong to do so? Or are they just being sensible in not
wanting a taste of the growing gap between rich and poor, the drug
addiction, the sleaze, the corruption, the social breakdown, the urban
gun crime and trash TV that more and more characterises these two
countries today?

Significantly, terms such as Ummah and Dar-al-Islam are more or less
untranslatable, indicating a degree of cohesion and comradely
brotherhood that those outside the Arabic and Muslim world can barely
understand.

Though few of us realise it, we in the West are spoon-fed a bogus view
of reality: the truth only comes out in peripheral areas. Times,
Telegraph and Observer dribble on and on about the wonderful EU
constitution, or how we must ‘democratise’ Iraq. However in the
travel sections of such papers you can still read the occasional
comment on the wonderful hospitality to be found in Libya or Syria, in
spite of everything that happened in recent years.

Apparently, tourists there can find themselves being invited, after a
passing acquaintance with a citizen of those ‘evil’ countries, to stay
and eat in private homes. Just try doing that in New York or London!
As Gavin Maxwell wrote of his stay in pre-Saddam and pre-American
Apocalypse Iraq :

‘Throughout our journey I was struck by the boorishness of Western
hospitality by contrast with that of the Arabs. If a stranger rings a
doorbell in Europe, he must produce some very good reason before he
can get into the house at all, much less eat there as a guest; yet in
the lands where there are neither doors nor doorbells the stranger is
not asked the reason for his presence, and to hesitate in setting food
before him would be shameful.’

The anti-Islam crowd often pipes up that some Muslim countries, most
notably Saudi Arabia and Iran, have a harsh judicial code,
particularly for errant women. While there is – of course – a kernel
of truth in this, I would suggest that Western countries should get
their own houses in order before interfering in the affairs of other
countries. As comparatively recently as the 1950s it wasn’t unheard of
for women to receive capital punishment in Britain and America on
highly dubious evidence of murder, when their real crime was
‘immorality’. More recently, President Bush laughed about the
execution of Karla Faye Tucker.

Today in Blair’s blight land, the single largest category of female
prisoners consists of the ‘desperadoes’ who have failed to pay their
TV licenses. Additionally, the high suicide rate across the entire
penal system means that the official view that Britain has no death
penalty is somewhat flawed to say the least.

As is clear from the Last Sermon of the Last Prophet, true Islam has a
civilised attitude towards woman, unlike the misogyny that disfigures
a significant amount of Judaic (and Christian) thought:

‘O People, it is true that you have certain rights with regard to your
women, but they also have rights over you. Remember that you have
taken them as your wives only under Allah’s trust and with His
permission. If they abide by your right then to them belongs the right
to be fed and clothed in kindness. Do treat your women well and be
kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers. And it
is your right that they do not make friends with any one of whom you
do not approve, as well as never to be unchaste. ’

Muslims will have to face the fact that they are hated, not for their
vices, but for their virtues. The normal mind to a large extent rebels
against such a novel thought. As with the true story of what really
happened on September 11th, the average person has a mental block when confronted by the perverse, amoral wickedness implied by ‘hatred of
virtues’.

Most know or at least intuitively sense that two massive towers
couldn’t really have been destroyed by a pair of Boeing passenger
aircraft, but prefer not to contemplate the awful truth.

As for actual as opposed to fabled ‘Muslim terrorism’ – not that I
agree with the dubious practice of coupling faith allegiance to
terrorism – has there actually been any? There was the attack on the
USS Cole, of course, but can one really describe suicidally brave men
in motor-boats versus a huge floating leviathan as ‘terrorism’? Other
incidents such as Achille Lauro and the Munich Olympics have more than
a whiff of the agent provocateur about them.

America today, in line with its stultifying decay, hardly produces any
new contributors to the world of thought. Though scarcely comparable
to Mencken or Brooks Adams, the present-day philosophic duo of Beavis
and Butthead have it right: ‘People are STUPID’.

Yes, people are stupid, especially modern Britons or Americans. They
are pleased to accept assessments of one of the world’s great
religions from various self-interested parties with an axe to grind – from tame professors run by the intelligence agencies, to
fundamentalist ‘Christian’ Zionist nutcases who want to bring on
Armageddon.

The Prophet Muhammad whom they ignorantly deride was in actuality – by
the standards of his time and ours – an extraordinarily humane man.
One interesting fact that is seldom brought out today is that many
thousands of Western Europeans are direct descendants of the Last
Prophet.

As for Muslims and Arabs in general, they can take some small comfort
from the words of Beregond, the soldier of Gondor, in Tolkien’s Lord
of the Rings: ‘We have this honour: ever we bear the brunt of the
chief hatred of the Enemy.’

guerillanews.com


(U.S. Government Lied to us)- Number of Troops in Iraq Not What Officially Reported

June 2, 2007

 

The U.S. uses a number of deceptions, definitional illusions and euphemisms, including counting only “combat forces” and “military personnel,” to drastically undercount the number of U.S. forces involved in Iraq, which are at least twice the number as those quoted in the media.

Even President Bush’s January announcement of a “surge” of 21,500 U.S. troops, opposed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has now morphed into 30,000 troops with an additional “headquarters staff” of 3,000, although the currently reported total U.S. military in Iraq is 145,000.

The number of U.S. forces reported by the government, required to occupy a country slightly more than twice the size of Idaho, hides the true extent of vast U.S. resources invested in personnel, material and other costs. The real number is almost impossible to find in government released information even with a great amount of interpretation.

According to GlobalSecurity.org, a public policy organization that provides background information on defense and homeland security, keeping track of American forces has become “significantly more difficult as the military seeks to improve operational security and to deceive potential enemies and the media as to the extent of American operations.” According to John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, there are a number of other reasons affecting the accurate counting of the number of military forces involved in Iraq. Large numbers of troops are activated with unspecified duties to unspecified areas; many small units from various locations are being mobilized from the army and national guard, which count units differently; and groups rotate in and out of Iraqi so quickly it’s impossible for anyone but the Pentagon to calculated how many are there. The Pentagon tracks these numbers, but Pike says they aren’t telling.

“We only try to nail the numbers down when we think Americans are getting ready to blow someone up,” Pike says. “The Pentagon knows the numbers and we have certainly not done anything to highball it. Certainly, if there’s a chance to release or hold numbers, they are parsimonious.”

Additionally, private enterprise military “contractors” almost double the number of U.S. forces in Iraq. After four contractors were hung from a bridge in Fallujah in March 2004, the Bush Administration stonewalled congressional efforts to force the Pentagon to release information about the number of contractors in Iraq. Finally, the Pentagon reported a total of 25,000.

In “The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security,” Deborah D. Avant, director for the Institute for Global and Internal Studies at George Washington University, reports that official numbers are difficult to find, but “This is the largest deployment of U.S. contractors in a military operation.” In October, the military’s first census of contractors totaled 100,000, not counting subcontractors, and in February 2007, AP reported 120,000 contractors (which would put Bush’s “surge” closer to 50,000).

Contractors, which some call mercenaries, provide support services essential to maintaining the U.S. military presence in Iraq. Ten times the number of contractors employed during the Persian Gulf War, these contract mercenaries now cook meals, interrogate prisoners, fix flat tires, repair vehicles, and provide guard duty. Military personnel formerly filled these types of jobs until former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld instituted his “Total Force” plan, which relies on a smaller U.S. military force with “its active and reserve military components, its civil servants, and its contractors.” Senator Jim Webb of Virginia called this a “rent-an-army.”

What are the total of U.S. forces are in Iraq? The government reported 145,000 U.S. military forces in Iraq but John Pike estimates the current total at 150,000. Another 20,000 will arrive as part of the “surge,” a last gasp public relations effort to save the operation from total failure.

John Pike estimates another 30,000 are “in the theater” to provide “Operation Iraqi Freedom” support. The army and marines have another 10,000 to 20,000 in Kuwait, and a nearby air force wing-bombing group has 5,000. Current naval exercises in the Persian Gulf, which represents a show of force against Iran for kidnapping 15 British sailors, include 10,000 U.S. personnel, the carrier groups Eisenhower and the Stennis, and 15 warships.

Add the 120,000 contract mercenaries and the forces involved in the Iraqi operation and the total comes to 300,000 to 360,000, more than twice the “official” figure of 145,000 troops. This isn’t counting the more than 5,000 British combat troops and navy, down from a high of 40,000 during the initial invasion, or the rag-tag remnants of the highly vaulted “Coalition of the Willing,” which has dwindled since the beginning of the occupation to 27 mostly small countries such as Armenia, Estonia, Moldavia and Latvia. Manipulated figures and private military contractors provide the Bush Administration with political cover to escape public scrutiny and keep injuries, deaths and secret operations out of the public eye. A more accurate and honest view of participation in the Iraqi occupation by the government could give Americans more reason to oppose the waste of lives and resources on this ill-conceived, poorly planned, and disastrous Keystone Cops venture.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MON20070427&articleId=5503


9/11 First Responders (Mp3 files)- Be ready to “hear” the truth

June 2, 2007

A must hear from the real American
heros. The firemen, police and caring citizens deserve
better than to be used for propaganda and photo ops
by a government of treasonists trying to promote an agenda.
If this makes you cry or boils your blood
it’s because you still have a conscience.

1-Intro-Les_Jamieson-NY_Stories.mp3
2-David_Miller-National_Guard.mp3
3-Craig_Bartmer-Police_Officer.mp3
4-Mike_McCormick-National_Guard.mp3
5-Kevin_McPadden-Air_Force.mp3
6-Donna_Marsha_O__Connor.mp3
7-Janet_McKinley-Resident.mp3
8-Willie_Rodriguez-Janitor.mp3

Streaming (m3u)

Various Intervious and Speeches

000ctcRusso1.mp3 000ctcRusso2.mp3 000ctcRusso3.mp3 001rokke.mp3

002ritter.mp3 003mlkagainstvietnam.mp3 004eggelletion.mp3 005wheat.mp3

006massey.mp3 007millegan.mp3 008Constitution1.mp3 008Constitution2.mp3

008Constitution3.mp3 009egriffin.mp3 009egriffin_2.mp3 009egriffin_3.mp3

010hilton1.mp3 010hilton2.mp3 010hilton3.mp3 011beckman.mp3

012perkins.mp3 012perkins_2.mp3 013alextalksport.mp3 014laughlin.mp3

015dGriffinFetzer.mp3 015dGriffin_cspan.mp3 015griffin.mp3 016deagle1.mp3

017tartaglia.mp3 018JamesEnnis.mp3 019hopsicker.mp3 020okc1.mp3

021bannon.mp3 022alexresponds.mp3 023bollyn.mp3 024roberts.mp3

025AldousHuxley.mp3 026wingsofjustice.mp3 027connett.mp3 028McLamb.mp3

028McLambPsy.mp3 028McLamb_2.mp3 028mcLambZion.mp3 029DavidShaylerMI5.mp3

031decamp4.mp3 032DrSteveJones1.mp3 032DrSteveJones2.mp3 032jonesjones.mp3

033Prouty1.mp3 033Prouty2.mp3 034EustaceMullins1.mp3 034EustaceMullins2.mp3

035KevinRyan.mp3 035KevinRyan911.mp3 036StadtmillerRusso1.mp3 036StadtmillerRusso2.mp3

037szymanski.mp3 038ctc911RT1.mp3 038ctc911RT2.mp3 038ctc911RT3.mp3

038ctc911RT4.mp3 038ctc911RT5.mp3 039jk061126.mp3 040bean.mp3

041boyle.mp3 042jb1.mp3 042jb2.mp3 043ajResist.mp3

043ajResist2.mp3 043ajResist3.mp3 043watada.mp3 1-Intro-Les_Jamieson-NY_Stories.mp3

2-David_Miller-National_Guard.mp3 3-Craig_Bartmer-Police_Officer.mp3 4-Mike_McCormick-National_Guard.mp3 5-Kevin_McPadden-Air_Force.mp3

6-Donna_Marsha_O__Connor.mp3 7-Janet_McKinley-Resident.mp3 8-Willie_Rodriguez-Janitor.mp3

Source: SupportTheTruth.com


France: Sarkozy concentrates power in his own hands

June 2, 2007

 

Newly elected French president Nicolas Sarkozy has used the first days in office to concentrate a broad range of power in his hands comparable only to that possessed by former French leader Gen. Charles de Gaulle. Even prior to the parliamentary elections in June, Sarkozy is undertaking a series of initiatives which will allow him to govern without any effective external control. To this end he is exploiting the constitution of the Fifth Republic to its limits—and beyond.

The current French constitution was tailored to suit the needs of its author, Gen. de Gaulle. Upon assuming power in 1958 at the height of the Algerian crisis, de Gaulle imposed a constitution which awarded huge authority to the president and severely limited the power of the National Assembly. The president not only appoints the head of government and presides over weekly cabinet meetings, he can also dissolve parliament at any time and thereby has powerful leverage over the elected representatives of the people.

There have been numerous changes in the way the constitution has been implemented since de Gaulle’s resignation in 1969. In particular during periods of so-called “cohabitation,” when the president and parliamentary majority have come from opposed political camps, the president has been forced to accommodate himself to the parliamentary majority, refrained from interference in domestic policy and concentrated on the prerogative of a French president—foreign policy.

Sarkozy has made clear that he now intends to fully exploit the authority of the presidential office and determine government policy down to the last detail. He has appointed one of his closest political allies, François Fillon, as head of government. Although the appointment of individual ministers is normally the task of the head of the government and not the president, Sarkozy’s office has appointed all of the government ministers and presented them to the public. Even before effectively taking office, Fillon has been exposed as a mere instrument of the president.

Sarkozy’s autocratic moves are not limited to controlling the machinery of government. He is also seeking to free himself from any control from within his own political camp, which is split into several opposing fractions. In so doing he is using the classic techniques of Bonapartist rule. He is seeking to create greater manoeuvring space for himself by navigating between the various parties and playing off one against the other, combined with demagogic, supra-class appeals to the “people.”

This is what lies behind his stance of “opening up”—i.e., admitting members of other parties and humanitarian organizations into the government. His various initiatives—filling half the ministerial positions with women, appointing a cabinet minister of North African descent, attempting to integrate the trade union bureaucracy into the work of the government—all serve this purpose. Far from signalling a readiness to compromise, Sarkozy is providing himself the room he thinks he needs to implement a right-wing program. To date, any attempts to carry out such a program have been met with massive popular resistance and consequent crises for the French ruling elite.

Socialist Party cabinet ministersIn the final analysis Sarkozy’s ability to pose as a strong president rests on the submissive attitude of the so-called French “left” and the trade union bureaucracy. Following the election campaign of the Socialist Party candidate, Ségolène Royal, who sought to outdo Sarkozy in terms of nationalism and law-and-order rhetoric, it is only logical that some of her followers have now switched to the camp of the winner.

The most prominent among them is the 67-year-old Bernard Kouchner, who has been appointed foreign minister in the new government. Kouchner is a co-founder of the organisation “Doctors without Borders” and was a member of the French Socialist Party until his latest government appointment. He served as state secretary and as minister under several Socialist Party prime ministers between 1988 and 2002. Between 1999 and 2000 he was the UN special representative in Kosovo.

Kouchner began his political career in the Communist Party before being expelled in 1966. Following a Red Cross deployment in Biafra he turned to humanitarian work, which he completely detached from any examination of the social and political roots of the various disasters. He endorsed the imperialist military interventions in Bosnia and Kosovo and later even supported the Iraq war.

Kouchner is useful for Sarkozy for a number of reasons; first, as a left fig leaf for the latter’s right-wing social and domestic policies. Kouchner, for example, will collaborate on a regular basis with the new minister for immigration and national identity—Sarkozy confidante Brice Hortefeux—although Kouchner had described the very creation of such a ministry as a “historically scandalous decline” during the recent election campaign.

Second, Kouchner is useful as an advocate of “humanitarian” military interventions in Africa, which Sarkozy regards as one of the most important spheres of interests for French imperialism. Kouchner is keen to form an international “contact group,” which will put pressure—including eventual military intervention—on Sudan because of the Darfur crisis. Kouchner has even endorsed a boycott of the Olympic Games in Peking in order to force China to break its trade relations with Sudan.

Third, Kouchner, along with Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, favours the passing of a pared-down European constitution without resorting to a fresh referendum. Kouchner also favours improved relations with the US. However, as usual in French politics, the president will determine key questions of foreign policy, rather than his foreign minister.

Another former Socialist Party member, Jean-Pierre Jouyet, has joined the new government as undersecretary of state for European affairs. Unlike Kouchner, Jouyet never played a prominent role in the Socialist Party, but he does have a long career in important government posts—including deputy director of the cabinet of the former prime minister, Lionel Jospin. He maintains a close personal friendship with presidential candidate Royal and her partner, the chairman of the Socialist Party, François Hollande, going all the way back to their student days 30 years ago. Jouyet had already taken up leading posts in the Gaullist government three years ago.

Eric Besson, on the other hand, only broke with the Socialist Party during the election campaign. He was part of Royal’s election campaign team as an expert for economic questions, but then attacked her publicly for refusing to explain how she would finance her proposed reforms. He has now been rewarded with the post of an undersecretary of state, with the task of evaluating government policy.

The fourth former “left” in the cabinet is Martin Hirsch, who until now headed the charitable Emmaüs institute for homeless people founded by Abbé Pierre. Hirsch has the pompous title “High Commissioner for Solidarity against Poverty,” but lacks his own ministry or any administrative machinery. Formerly, Hirsch had occupied leading posts in the Jospin administrations, including under health minister Kouchner.

Hollande has publicly denounced the rebels as “traitors,” while other prominent party members—including Ségolène Royal and former finance minister Dominique Strauss-Kahn—have demonstratively refused to condemn the defectors. They are keeping their options open for the possibility of future cooperation with Sarkozy, while former culture minister Jack Lang (also Socialist Party) has already met with the new president for a discussion.

Right-wing ministers in key departmentsSarkozy has filled all the remaining ministerial posts—in particular those responsible for the interior (security), economic and social policy—with either close political allies or heavyweights from his Union for a Popular Movement (UMP).

The only exception is the defence ministry, which has gone to the leader of the parliamentary fraction of the right-wing UDF (Union for French Democracy), Hervé Morin. Morin supported the UDF candidate François Bayrou in the presidential election campaign, but then fully backed Sarkozy in the second ballot—in contrast to Bayrou, who made no endorsement. His appointment as minister is obviously aimed at undermining Bayrou’s newly founded “Democratic Movement” in the upcoming legislative elections June 10 and 17.

The deputy head of government, with responsibility for the environment, energy and traffic, is Alain Juppé. Appointed prime minister by Jacques Chirac in 1995, Juppé had to step down in favour of the Socialist Jospin following a strike wave against his pension plans that paralysed the country for weeks. For some time Juppé was considered Chirac’s heir-in-waiting, but then had to give up his own presidential ambitions following a corruption scandal.

The new interior minister is former defence minister Michèle Alliot-Marie—also a close confidante of Chirac. Her partner is Patrick Ollier, the UMP president of the National Assembly.

The justice ministry goes to 41-year-old Rachida Dati, daughter of a Moroccan father and an Algerian mother, from a working class family of 12 children. She represents an aggressive new generation of careerists. Her job will be to draw up and help implement Sarkozy’s planned drastic tightening of the laws against young offenders.

The spheres of economics, social affairs and finance have been completely restructured by Sarkozy in order to impose his planned “reforms.” Three established UMP members have been put in charge: the former social minister Jean-Louis Borloo takes over economics, finance and labour; the former health minister Xavier Bertrand is responsible for social affairs; and former undersecretary of state Eric Woerth is in charge of public finances and administration.

Integration of the trade unionsSarkozy spent a remarkably long time ensuring the support of the French trade unions for his government. In the two days before taking office and appointing the government, he devoted several hours to individual discussions with the chairmen of the six largest union federations—all of whom subsequently declared their willingness to cooperate with his government.

Then Sarkozy’s first official trip as president inside the country was to Toulouse, where he spoke to employees of Airbus threatened by mass redundancies. He later shared lunch with them in the canteen. Sarkozy promised to increase the share of the French state in the mother company, EADS, and revise the controversial reconstruction plan Power 8. He also guaranteed that the closure-threatened Méaulte factory in northern France would be kept open.

After the meeting union officials expressed enthusiasm for his visit. They are attracted to the pronounced nationalism that Sarkozy emphasizes in his economic policy. On the other hand, Sarkozy’s pronouncement was greeted with alarm by the German government in Berlin, which fears a loss of its own influence in the pan-European aerospace company.

Nobody should deceived by Sarkozy’s populist overtures. He is intent on using his presidential powers and the support of the trade unions to carry out the sort of attacks on social gains and democratic rights that have long been demanded by French big business circles and international financial markets.

source: The above article was sent to me via email from:

www.islamservices.org


Video: Israel`s Secret Nuclear Weapon

June 2, 2007

Which country in the Middle East has undeclared nuclear weapons?

Which country in the Middle East has undeclared biological and chemical capabilities?

Which country in the Middle East has no outside inspections?

Which country has jailed its nuclear whistleblower for 18 years?

Watch the video to know the answer of these questions and to know some interesting facts about Israel`s nuclear weapon:


Hebron settlers assault internationals and Israeli

June 2, 2007

On October 18, 2005, settlers assault internationals and an Israeli activist, repeatedly threatening them.
The soldiers do almost nothing to stop the attacks.


Video: Israeli Settler Harassing Palestinian Woman in Hebron

June 2, 2007

A Jewish settler “occupier”  in Hebron went to a Palestinian woman and told her to shut her door and never come out of her house.

What is that?

The Palestinian woman, of course, lost her temper and started shouting because whether she opens the door of her house or not, it is her house and it is her door.

The Israeli occupier tried to take the video camera from the person who was taping the whole incident but she couldn`t.

The zionist occupier, then, started calling the Palestinian woman “bitch!!” in its equivalent Arabic word.

What do you expect from Arabs when they even cannot live in their own houses without someone coming to them limiting their freedom at their own house?

Watch the following video: