London Olympic Logo says “Zion”

June 6, 2007

 All I want NOW, is for someone to tell me that this WASN’T planned!! I hope our GREAT symbolic analysts will take a look at what I have found and start analyzing it so I know what the “symbolists” who designed this logo have in mind for us!!

When I got the first email stating that the logo spelled ZION, I chuckled… when I got the second one, I said “Hmmmm”… maybe I should take a look!! I took a look and sure enough ZION was there!!

LONDON OLYMPIC LOGO SPELLS ZION

But THEN I started getting emails that said there the logo looked like a stylized Swastika!! I dismissed that immediately… but the more time went by, the more I thought about it… So printed out the original logo… cut it up… laid it out in pieces… and guess what… I saw the stylized logo too… I added NO pieces… I did NOT use the large part that had the Olympic circles on it, I cut around the circles so I could put the stylized 3-legged Swastika in the middle circle. I did NOT use the “dot”.

LONDON OLYMPICS STYLIZED SWASTIKA


Very Important: One of my blog readers sent me a message FBI and Scotland Yard are after him and wordpress shut down his blog

June 6, 2007

Nizam Ali one of the Muslim men who constantly check out my blog and comment my posts, has just commented one of my posts. It was a cry for help not just a comment. He is a Muslim man from Trindad and of course we know that Muslims from Trindad has been located on the ugly map of “war on terror” since last JFK “plot”.

Here is what he said in his recent comment,

“I live in trinidad. I tell you where ever muslims are they will have a problem. I t has always been so. Muslims are always the target. The FBI , Scotland Yard , they are all here. I am sure they are monitoring me and my family as well. Even this comment.”

“But Allah Almighty always test us. this is His test. I pray for his strength and patience to bare it.”

“Like I told our two teenagers, Goerge Bush declared war on terror. He will take his war to all corners of the globe. If there is a war you have to expect anything, not that I am condoning what is alledged,But Allah Almighty is in control still and we watch His plan unfolding.”

Seconds later, I found another comment of his that said,

“BTW my blog was shut down by wordpress.Still cannot figure out why.”

So, here is an example of what is going on there under the false flag of “war on terror”. It is the other way around. They are the real terrorists. They are the ones terrorizing innocent Muslims everywhere and you know who exactly I am referring to by “they”.

This is unacceptable. Muslims must do something. I am now forcing myself not to burst into tears because I can feel the horror  in that man`s comment not just because he is Muslim but because I really hate to see someone that frightened even if that person is not religious whatsoever.

My prayers for all Muslims persecuted on this earth. My prayers for anyone who is being persecuted for what he/she believes in.

My dear brother Nizam, remember this:

“If aught that is good befalls you, it grieves them; but if some misfortune overtakes you, they rejoice at it. But if ye are constant and do right, not the least harm will their cunning do to you; for Allah Compasseth round about all that they do. ” (3:120)

“إِن تَمْسَسْكُمْ حَسَنَةٌ تَسُؤْهُمْ وَإِن تُصِبْكُمْ سَيِّئَةٌ يَفْرَحُواْ بِهَا وَإِن تَصْبِرُواْ وَتَتَّقُواْ لاَ يَضُرُّكُمْ كَيْدُهُمْ شَيْئًا إِنَّ الله بِمَا يَعْمَلُونَ مُحِيطٌ 

(آل عمران :120)


OFFICIAL RECORDS FROM INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS PROVE “HOLOCAUST” WAS A FRAUD!

June 6, 2007

RECENTLY RELEASED RECORDS, SEALED FOR YEARS, SHOW “CONCENTRATION CAMP” DEATH TOTALS OF ONLY 271,301

SIX MILLION JEWS DID NOT DIE; THE WHOLE CLAIM WAS A COMPLETE FABRICATION

For years, Jews have told people around the world that six million of them were systematically murdered in German “Concentration Camps” during World War 2. Anyone disputing this claim has been viciously smeared as a hateful anti-Semite. Countries around the world have even jailed people for disputing the claim that 6 Million were killed.Here now, for all the world to see, is a scanned image of an Official International Red Cross document proving the so-called “Holocaust” never happened. Jews around the world intentionally lied for the purpose of gaining emotional and business advantages for themselves.  They committed willful, criminal FRAUD upon millions around the world!”The Holocaust” is the greatest lie ever told. Millions of dollars have been paid out to “holocaust survivors” and their descendants for something that DID NOT HAPPEN. THis is intentional, criminal fraud on a scale so massive as to almost incomprehensible.
Below is the scanned image of the Official Death Total report from the International Red Cross.

“The Holocaust” is the greatest lie ever told. Millions of dollars have been paid out to “holocaust survivors” and their descendants for something that DID NOT HAPPEN. The claim of a “Holocaust” was intentional, criminal fraud on a scale so massive as to be almost incomprehensible.I call for criminal prosecution of individuals and groups who filed false lawsuits to obtain holocaust reparations and financial damage awards, for perpetrating deliberate fraud upon Courts. I call for the removal of Holocaust references in History books and educational materials. I call for the removal of Holocaust Memorials worldwide.It is long overdue this intentional fraud be halted and those who perpetrated it be brought to justice for 60 years of vicious lies and financial fraud.

Here are some previous posts on the Holocaust:

(1) Israel declares there were no Holocaust Extermination

(2) Lawsuit: Recognize 2nd generation as Shoah (Holocaust) victims
(3) I am a Holocaust denier and I am unfraid


Experts cast doubt on credibility of JFK terror plot

June 6, 2007

An alleged plot to blow up fuel tanks and pipelines at New York’s JFK airport had little chance of success, according to safety experts, who have questioned whether the plot ever posed a real threat.

US authorities said Saturday they had averted an attack that could have resulted in “unfathomable damage, deaths, and destruction,” and charged four alleged Islamic radicals with conspiracy to cause an explosion at the airport.

But according to the experts, it would have been next to impossible to cause an explosion in the jet fuel tanks and pipeline. Furthermore, the plotters seem to have lacked the explosives and financial backing to carry out the attack.

John Goglia, a former member of National Transportation Safety Board, said that if the plot had ever been carried out, it would likely have sparked a fire but little else, and certainly not the mass carnage authorities described.

“You could definitely reach the tank, definitely start the fire, but to get the kind of explosion that they were thinking that they were going to get… this is virtually impossible to do,” he told AFP.

The fuel pipelines around the airport would similarly burn, rather than explode, because they are a full of fuel and unable to mix with enough oxygen.

“We had a number of fires in the US. All that happens is a big fire,” he said. “It won’t blow up, it will only burn.”

Even if the attackers had managed to blow up a fuel tank, the impact would be limited, he said, citing the example of North Vietnamese forces attacking US fuel dumps during the Vietnam war.

“They hit the fuel tanks with pretty big rockets. You would get a big fire but not a big explosion other than the rocket.”

“There is a difference between just exploding the tank and a huge explosion. The tank may explode and blow up some metal, but that certainly wouldn’t go very far,” he said.

His comments contrasted with those of US Attorney Roslynn Mauskopf, who insisted at the weekend that “the devastation that would be caused had this plot succeeded is just unthinkable.”

Jake Magish, an engineer with Supersafe Tank Systems, also cast doubt on the credibility of the plot, saying: “The fantasy that I’ve heard about the people saying ‘they will blow the tank and destroy the airport,’ is nonsense.”

“There are people there responding to hysteria, I think. But from an engineering point of view, if someone is successful in blowing a hole into a tank, they will just have a fire from one tank.

“There is no way for the fire to go from tank to tank, that is nonsense. It just won’t happen.”

Besides the alleged plotters’ capability, other questions have focused on the main source in the probe — a convicted drug dealer who infiltrated the group and whose sentence was pending as part of his cooperation with police.

Neal Sonnett, a former federal prosecutor, told the New York Times there was also a danger in overstating how serious or sophisticated a plot really was.

“There unfortunately has been a tendency to shout too loudly about such cases,” he said. “To the extent that you over-hype a case, you create fear and paranoia,” he said.

The New York Times on Sunday pointedly avoided giving much coverage to the alleged plot, devoting only a brief on its front page continued on the local section, despite the story breaking in the early afternoon on Saturday.

Source: TheRawStory


Muslims and 7/7

June 6, 2007

  

Police carry out an anti-terror raid in London and (below) the 7/7 bus bomb blast in Tavistock Square

Yesterday British papers were filled with articles reporting the Channel 4 poll of British Muslims.

Here are some of the headlines with brief excerpts:

Mirror.co.uk

Muslims: MI5 Behind 7/7

The poll for Channel 4 News found 24 per cent of UK Muslims thought the Government or bodies such as MI5 were “involved in some way”. Fifty-two per cent of 500 Muslims asked also think the security services “made up” evidence against the four bombers who killed 52 people. And 68 per cent said the Muslim community does not bear responsibility for the emergence of extremists in the UK.

The Sun Online

Muslims: ‘Bombers Innocent’

Over half of Muslims believe the security services have made up evidence to convict terror suspects.

The poll, indicating opinions among the estimated three million Muslims in Britain, was conducted for Channel 4 News.

Telegraph.co.uk

A quarter of Britain’s two million Muslims believe Government agents staged the July 7 suicide bombings, a new survey has found.

They think the four men named as the killers of 52 passengers on the London transport system were not responsible for the attacks.

The poll, for Channel 4 News, discovered that conspiracy theories about July 7 are rife among Muslims – similar to those about the 9/11 attacks in the United States.

Daily Express

24% of Muslims think 7/7 raids were MI5 plot

Tory MP Greg Hands said he found the survey “extremely worrying”, adding: “There needs to be a reality check among those who have given their responses to this poll.

Are you kidding me? Reality check my ass!!

Just one simple question before I wrap up this post:

The Sun Online mentioned that British Muslims are 3 million while The Telegraph reported that British Muslims are 2 millions. Where is the missed million? And why their numbers are so hugely different there?


Muslim girl’s headscarf was erased from school photo in Australia

June 6, 2007

A MUSLIM schoolgirl’s traditional headscarf was erased from a class photograph, a parliamentary inquiry has heard.

A state parliamentary inquiry into dress codes and school uniforms yesterday heard several Muslim students had been discriminated against because of their dress.

Islamic Council of Victoria executive committee member Sherene Hassan said the student wore her hijab in a class photograph, but it was airbrushed so it would not stand out.

“You can imagine that was quite demoralising,” Ms Hassan said.

Ms Hassan also told the inquiry one Victorian student was told she would not be admitted to school if she wore her hijab.

“That individual was so keen to attend that school she decided not to wear her headscarf,” she said.

While the majority of schools supported students who wore the headgear, some teachers needed more understanding of Islam, she said.

The inquiry is considering whether school uniforms should be made compulsory.

Source: http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21848974-2862,00.html

Update:

The above news story was on Yahoo news. I checked it out this morning and it was gone. If you Google this news story, you will find this written below the title:

“A Victorian Muslim schoolgirl had her traditional headscarf airbrushed from a class photograph in just one example of the discrimination Islamic students …”

That was a part of the deleted article. I guess some was freaked out because the article repeated the phrase “discrimination against Muslims in Australia”

Why “Yahoo News” deleted this news story in the first day it was published?

Here is the deleted link:

http://au.messages.yahoo.com/news/top-stories/692018/


“The Secret History of the American Empire”- Economic Hit Men, Jackals, and the Truth about Global Corruption

June 6, 2007

 

This is an interview with a man who claims to have worked deep inside the forces driving corporate globalization. In his first book, “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man”, John Perkins told the story of his work as a highly paid consultant hired to strong-arm leaders into creating policy favorable to the U.S. government and corporations — what he calls the “corporatocracy.”

You can either listen to the show or read the transcript below:

Listen to Segment || Download Show mp3      
Watch 128k stream       Watch 256k stream  

TRANSCRIPT

AMY GOODMAN: Hundreds of thousands of protesters are gathering in Germany ahead of tomorrow’s G8 meeting of the world’s richest nations. The three-day summit is being held in the coastal resort of Heiligendamm. German police have spent $18 million to erect an eight-mile-long, two-meter-high fence around the meeting site.

Global warming will be high on the agenda. Going into the meeting, President Bush has proposed to sideline the UN-backed Kyoto Accords and set voluntary targets on reducing emissions of greenhouse gas. Other top issues will include foreign aid and new trade deals.

Today, we spend the hour with a man who claims to have worked deep inside the forces driving corporate globalization. In his first book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, John Perkins told the story of his work as a highly paid consultant hired to strong-arm leaders into creating policy favorable to the US government and corporations, what he calls the “corporatocracy.” John Perkins says he helped the US cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then taking over their economies. John Perkins has just come out with his second book on this issue. It’s called The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals and the Truth about Global Corruption. John Perkins joins us now in the firehouse studio. Welcome to Democracy Now!

JOHN PERKINS: Thank you, Amy. It’s great to be here.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, before we go further, “economic hit men” — for those who haven’t heard you describe this, let alone describe yourself as this, what do you mean?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, really, I think it’s fair to say that since World War II, we economic hit men have managed to create the world’s first truly global empire, and we’ve done it primarily without the military, unlike other empires in history. We’ve done it through economics very subtly.

We work many different ways, but perhaps the most common one is that we will identify a third world country that has resources our corporations covet, such as oil, and then we arrange a huge loan to that country from the World Bank or one of its sister organizations. The money never actually goes to the country. It goes instead to US corporations, who build big infrastructure projects — power grids, industrial parks, harbors, highways — things that benefit a few very rich people but do not reach the poor at all. The poor aren’t connected to the power grids. They don’t have the skills to get jobs in industrial parks. But they and the whole country are left holding this huge debt, and it’s such a big bet that the country can’t possibly repay it. So at some point in time, we economic hit men go back to the country and say, “Look, you know, you owe us a lot of money. You can’t pay your debt, so you’ve got to give us a pound of flesh.”

AMY GOODMAN: And explain your history. What made you an economic hit man?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, when I graduated from business school at Boston University, I was recruited by the National Security Agency, the nation’s largest and perhaps most secretive spy organization.

AMY GOODMAN: People sometimes think the CIA is that, but the NSA, many times larger.

JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, it is larger. It’s much larger. At least it was in those days. And it’s very, very secretive. We all — there’s a lot of rumors. We know quite a lot about the CIA, I think, but we know very, very little about the NSA. It claims to only work in a cryptography, you know, encoding and decoding messages, but in fact we all know that they’re the people who have been listening in on our telephone conversations. That’s come out recently. And they’re a very, very secretive organization.

They put me through a series of tests, very extensive tests, lie detector tests, psychological tests, during my last year in college. And I think it’s fair to say that they identified me as a good potential economic hit man. They also identified a number of weaknesses in my character that would make it relatively easy for them to hook me, to bring me in. And I think those weaknesses, I [inaudible] might call, the three big drugs of our culture: money, power and sex. Who amongst us doesn’t have one of them? I had all three at the time.

And then I joined the Peace Corps. I was encouraged to do that by the National Security Agency. I spent three years in Ecuador living with indigenous people in the Amazon and the Andes, people who today and at that time were beginning to fight the oil companies. In fact, the largest environmental lawsuit in the history of the world has just been brought by these people against Texaco, Chevron. And that was incredibly good training for what I was to do.

And then, while I was still in the Peace Corps, I was brought in and recruited into a US private corporation called Charles T. Main, a consulting firm out of Boston of about 2,000 employees, very low-profile firm that did a tremendous amount of work of what I came to understand was the work of economic hit men, as I described it earlier, and that’s the role I began to fulfill and eventually kind of rose to the top of that organization as its chief economist.

AMY GOODMAN: And how did that tie to the NSA? Was there a connection?

JOHN PERKINS: You know, that’s what’s very interesting about this whole system, Amy, is that there’s no direct connection. The NSA had interviewed me, identified me and then essentially turned me over to this private corporation. It’s a very subtle and very smart system, whereby it’s the private industry that goes out and does this work. So if we’re caught doing something, if we’re caught bribing or corrupting local officials in some country, it’s blamed on private industry, not on the US government.

And it’s interesting that in the few instances when economic hit men fail, what we call “the Jackals,” who are people who come in to overthrow governments or assassinate their leaders, also come out of private industry. These are not CIA employees. We all have this image of the 007, the government agent hired to kill, you know, with license to kill, but these days the government agents, in my experience, don’t do that. It’s done by private consultants that are brought in to do this work. And I’ve known a number of these individuals personally and still do.

AMY GOODMAN: In your book, The Secret History of the American Empire, you talk about taking on global power at every level. Right now, we’re seeing these mass protests taking place in Germany ahead of the G8 meeting. Talk about the significance of these.

JOHN PERKINS: Well, I think it’s extremely significant. Something is happening in the world today, which is very, very important. Yeah, as we watched the headlines this morning, you know, what we can absolutely say is we live in a very dangerous world. It’s also a very small world, where we’re able to immediately know what’s going on in Germany or in the middle of the Amazon or anywhere else. And we’re beginning to finally understand around the world, I think, that the only way my children or grandchildren or any child or grandchild anywhere on this planet is going to be able to have a peaceful, stable and sustainable world is if every child has that. The G8 hasn’t got that yet.

AMY GOODMAN: Explain what the Group of Eight are.

JOHN PERKINS: Well, the Group of Eight are the wealthiest countries in the world, and basically they run the world. And the leader is the United States, and it’s actually the corporations within these companies — countries, excuse me — that run it. It’s not the governments, because, after all, the governments serve at the pleasure of the corporations. In our own country, we know that the next two final presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, are going to each have to raise something like half a billion dollars. And that’s not going to come from me and you. Primarily that’s going to come from the people who own and run our big corporations. They’re totally beholden to the government. So the G8 really is this group of countries that represent the biggest multinational corporations in the world and really serve at their behest.

And what we’re seeing now in Europe — and we’re seeing it very strongly in Latin America, we’re seeing it in the Middle East — we’re seeing this huge undercurrent of resistance, of protest, against this empire that’s been built out of this. And it’s been such a subtle empire that people haven’t been aware of it, because it wasn’t built by the military. It was built by economic hit men. Most of us aren’t aware of it. Most Americans have no idea that these incredible lifestyles that we all lead are because we’re part of a very vicious empire that literally enslaves people around the world, misuses people. But we’re beginning to understand this. And the Europeans and the Latin Americans are at the forefront of this understanding.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, we’re going to talk to you about Congo, about Lebanon, about the Middle East, about Latin America, much of what you cover in The Secret History of the American Empire, when we come back.

[break]

AMY GOODMAN: Our guest is John Perkins. From 1971 to ’81, he worked for the international consulting firm of Charles T. Main, where he was a self-described “economic hit man.” His new book is called The Secret History of the American Empire: Economic Hit Men, Jackals and the Truth about Global Corruption. Let’s talk back, going to Latin America, about this ChevronTexaco lawsuit.

JOHN PERKINS: Well, that’s extremely significant. When I was sent to Ecuador as a Peace Corps volunteer in 1968, Texaco had just gone into Ecuador, and the promise to the Ecuadorian people at that time from Texaco and their own politicians and the World Bank was oil is going to pull this country out of poverty. And people believed it. I believed it at the time. The exact opposite has happened. Oil has made the country much more impoverished, while Texaco has made fortunes off this. It’s also destroyed vast areas of the Amazon rainforest.

So the lawsuit today that’s being brought by a New York lawyer and some Ecuadorian lawyers — Steve Donziger here in New York — is for $6 billion, the largest environmental lawsuit in the history of the world, in the name of 30,000 Ecuadorian people against Texaco, which is now owned by Chevron, for dumping over eighteen billion gallons of toxic waste into the Ecuadorian rainforest. That’s thirty times more than the Exxon Valdez. And dozens and dozens of people have died and are continuing to die of cancer and other pollution-related diseases in this area of the Amazon. So all this oil has come out of this area, and it’s the poorest area of one of the poorest countries in the hemisphere. And the irony of that is just so amazing.

But what I think — one of the really significant things about this, Amy, is that this law firm has taken this on, not pro bono, but they expect if they win the case, which they expect to do, to make a lot of money off of it, which is a philosophical decision. It isn’t because they wanted to get rich off this. It’s because they want to encourage other law firms to do similar things in Nigeria and in Indonesia and in Bolivia, in Venezuela and many other places. So they want to see a business grow out of this, of law firms going in and defending poor people, knowing that they can get a payoff from the big companies who have acted so terribly, terribly, terribly irresponsibly in the past.

And Steve Donziger, the attorney — I was in Ecuador with him just two weeks ago — and one of the very touching things he said is — he’s an American attorney with, you know, very good credentials, and he says, “You know, I’ve seen a lot of companies make mistakes and then try to defend themselves in law courts.” And he said, “That’s one thing. But in this case, Texaco didn’t make mistakes. This was done with intent. They knew what they were doing. To save a few bucks, they killed a lot of people.” And now they’re going to be forced to pay for that, to take responsibility for that, and hopefully open the door to make many companies take responsibility for the wanton destruction that’s occurred.

AMY GOODMAN: Let’s talk about Latin America and its leaders, like Jaime Roldos. Talk about him and his significance. You wrote about him in your first book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.

JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, Jaime Roldos was an amazing man. After many years of military dictators in Ecuador, US puppet dictators, there was a democratic election, and one man, Jaime Roldos, ran on a platform that said Ecuadorian resources ought to be used to help the Ecuadorian people, and specifically oil, which at that time was just coming in. This was in the late ’70s. And I was sent to Ecuador, and I was also sent at the same time to Panama to work with Omar Torrijos, to bring these men around, to corrupt them, basically, to change their minds.

You know, in the case of Jaime Roldos, he won the election by a landslide, and now he started to put into action his policy, his promises, and was going to tax the oil companies. If they weren’t willing to give much more of their profits back to the Ecuadorian people, then he threatened to nationalize them. So I was sent down, along with other economic hit men — I played a fairly minor role in that case and a major one in Panama with Torrijos — but we were sent into these countries to get these men to change their policies, to go against their own campaign promises. And basically what you do is you tell them, “Look, you know, if you play our game, I can make you and your family very healthy. I can make sure that you get very rich. If you don’t play our game, if you follow your campaign promises, you may go the way of Allende in Chile or Arbenz in Guatemala or Lumumba in the Congo.” On and on, we can list all these presidents that we’ve either overthrown or assassinated because they didn’t play our game. But Jaime would not come around, Jaime Roldos. He stayed uncorruptible, as did Omar Torrijos.

And both of these — and from an economic hit man perspective, this was very disturbing, because not only did I know I was likely to fail at my job, but I knew that if I failed, something dire was going to happen: the Jackals would come in, and they would either overthrow these men or assassinate them. And in both cases, these men were assassinated, I have no doubt. They died in airplane crashes two months apart from each other in 1981 — single plane; their own private planes crashed.

AMY GOODMAN: Explain more what happened with Omar Torrijos.

JOHN PERKINS: Well, Omar, again, was very stalwartly standing up to the United States, demanding that the Panama Canal should be owned by Panamanians. And I spent a lot of time with Torrijos, and I liked him very, very much as an individual. He was extremely charismatic, extremely courageous and very nationalistic about wanting to get the best for his people. And I couldn’t corrupt him. I tried everything I could possibly do to bring him around. And as I was failing, I was also very concerned that something would happen to him. And sure enough — it was interesting that Jaime Roldos’s plane crashed in May, and Torrijos said — got his family together and said, “I’m probably next, but I’m ready to go. We’ve now got the Canal turned over.” He had signed a treaty with Jimmy Carter to get the Canal in Panamanian hands. He said, “I’ve accomplished my job, and I’m ready to go now.” And he had a dream about being in a plane that hit a mountain. And within two months after it happened to Roldos, it happened to Torrijos also.

AMY GOODMAN: And you met with both these men?

JOHN PERKINS: Yes, I’d met with both of them.

AMY GOODMAN: What were your conversations like?

JOHN PERKINS: Well, especially with Torrijos, I spent a lot of time with him in some formal meetings and also at cocktail parties and barbecues — he was big on things like that — and was constantly trying to get him to come around to our side and letting him know that if he did, he and his family would get some very lucrative contracts, would become very wealthy, and, you know, warning him. And he didn’t really need much warning, because he knew what would be likely to happen if he didn’t. And his attitude was, “I want to get done what I can in my lifetime, and then so be it.”

And it’s been interesting, Amy, that since I wrote the book Confessions, Marta Roldos, who’s Jaime’s daughter, has come to the United States to meet with me, and I just spent time with her in Ecuador. She is now a member of parliament in Ecuador, just elected, and she married Omar Torrijos’s nephew. And it’s really interesting to hear their stories about what was going on — she was seventeen at the time her parents — her mother was also in the plane that her father died in; the two of them died in that plane — and then to hear her talk about how her husband, Omar’s nephew, was in that meeting when the family was called together and Omar said, “I’m probably next, but I’m ready to go. I’ve done my job. I’ve done what I could do for my people. So I’m ready to go, if that’s what has to happen.”

AMY GOODMAN: So what were your conversations at the time with other so-called economic hit men? I mean, you became the chief consultant at Charles Main.

JOHN PERKINS: Chief economist.

AMY GOODMAN: Chief economist.

JOHN PERKINS: Right. Well, you know, when I was with other people that — we could be sitting at a table, say, in the Hotel Panama, knowing that we’re both here to win these guys over, but we also had our official jobs, which were to do studies on the economy, to show how if the country accepted the loan, it was going to improve its gross national product. We would talk about those kinds of things. It’s, I suspect, a little bit like if two CIA agents, spies, get together or have a beer together, they don’t really talk about what they’re really doing beneath the surface, but they’ve got an official job, too, and that’s what you focus on. And, in fact, the two, in my case, are very closely linked.

So we were producing these economic reports that would prove to the World Bank and would prove to Omar Torrijos that if he accepted these huge loans, then his country’s gross national product would just mushroom and pull his people out of poverty. And we produced these reports, which made sense from a mathematical econometric standpoint. And, in fact, it often happened that with these loans, the GNP, the gross national product, did increase.

But what also was true, and what Omar knew and Jaime Roldos knew and I was coming to know very strongly, was that even if the general economy increased, the poor people with these loans would get poorer. The rich would make all the money, because most of the poor people weren’t even tied into the gross national product. A lot of them didn’t even make income. They were living off subsistence farming. They benefited nothing, but they were left holding the debt, and because of these huge debts, their country in the long term would not be able to provide them with healthcare, education and other social services.

AMY GOODMAN: Talk about Congo.

JOHN PERKINS: Oh, boy. The whole story of Africa and the Congo is such a devastating and sad one. And it’s the hidden story, really. We in the United States don’t even talk about Africa. We don’t think about Africa. You know, Congo has something called coltan, which probably most of your listeners may not have even heard of, but every cell phone and laptop computer has coltan in it. And several million people in the last few years in the Congo have been killed over coltan, because you and I and all of us in the G8 countries demand low — or at least we want to see our computers inexpensive and our cell phones inexpensive. And, of course, the companies that make these sell them on that basis, that “Oh, here, mine’s $200 less than the other company.” But in order to do that, these people in the Congo are being enslaved. The miners, the people mining coltan, they’re being killed. There’s these vast wars going on to provide us with cheap coltan.

And I have to say, you know, if we want to live in a safe world, we need to be — we must be willing, and, in fact, we must demand that we pay higher prices for things like laptop computers and cell phones and that a good share of that money go back to the people who are mining the coltan. And that’s true of oil. It’s true of so many resources that we are not paying the true cost, and there’s millions of people around the world suffering from that. Roughly 50,000 people die every single day from hunger or hunger-related diseases and curable diseases that they don’t get the medicines for, simply because they’re part of a system that demands that they put in long hours, and they get very, very low pay, so we can have things cheaper in this country. And the Congo is an incredibly potent example of that.

In his stunning memoir, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, John Perkins detailed his former role as an “economic hit man“.

Now, in The Secret History of the American Empire, Perkins zeroes in on hot spots around the world, and drawing on interviews with other Hit Men, Jackals, reporters, government officials, and activists, examines the current geopolitical crisis. Instability is the norm—it’s clear that the world we’ve created is dangerous and no longer sustainable.  How did we get here?  Who’s responsible?  What good have we done and at what cost? And what can we do to change things for the next generations? Addressing these questions and more, Perkins reveals the secret history behind the events that have defined our world, including:

  •  The current Latin American Revolution and its lessons for democracy

  •  How the “Defeats” in Vietnam and Iraq benefited big business

  •  The role of Israel as Fortress America in the Middle East

  •  Tragic repercussions of the IMF’s “Asian Economic Collapse”

  •  US blunders in Tibet, Congo, Lebanon, and Venezuela 

  •  Jackal (CIA operatives) forays to assassinate democratic presidents

From the U.S. military in Iraq to infrastructure development in Indonesia, from Peace Corps volunteers in Africa to Jackals in the Indian Ocean, Perkins exposes a conspiracy of corruption that has fueled instability and anti-Americanism around the globe. Alarming yet hopeful, this book provides a compassionate plan to re-imagine our world.


Severe Indictment Of U.S. Foreign Policy

June 6, 2007

According to the just released Global Peace Index, created by The Economist Intelligence Unit, the U.S. is among the least peaceful nations in the world. And Russia is even less so, a severe condemnation for these two powerful countries. This serious indictment shows the need to reassess policies and return to the rule of international law if the goal for a more peaceful world is to be achieved.

The US ranked 96 out of 121 nations considered, worse than Yemen and slightly better than Iran, Honduras and South Africa. As a comparison, Japan ranked 5th, and three Scandinavian countries (Norway, Denmark and Sweden) ranked among the seven most peaceful countries in the world. Fifteen of the top most peaceful nations are in Western Europe, in countries with democratic values and good standard of living.

The index was based in 24 different indicators which measured peace inside and outside a country. The external indicators included the number of wars a country was involved in the last five years, how much money was earned in arms sales, how many soldiers were killed overseas, and defense spending.

A 2005 report by the World Policy Institute states that most of the U.S.’ arms sales to developing countries go to governments that the U.S. State Department qualifies as undemocratic, such as Pakistan, Angola and Saudi Arabia. Presently, U.S. military expenditures equal those of the next 25 countries put together. According to the Stockholm Peace Research Institute, military global spending in 2004 was over $1 trillion. Of that amount, almost 47 percent was spent by the U.S.

Domestic indicators included the number of people in prisons, relations with other countries, level of distrust in other citizens and number of violent crimes. The results were then reviewed by a panel of experts, who tried to find out the qualities that lead to a more peaceful environment.

The U.S., which occupied the 96th place, was just ahead of Iran, classified in the 97th place but behind Syria, which was in the 77 place. Russia and Israel occupied the 118th and 119th place respectively. U.S. involvement in Iraq and its doctrine of preemptive war, essentially flaunting international law, contributed to the U.S.’s poor showing. It studied 121 countries, from Algiers to Zimbabwe and it was released less than one week before the G8 leaders gather in Germany to discuss issues of global concern.

Almost at the same as the release of the Index rating, Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, declared to the BBC, “I wake up every morning and see 100 Iraqis innocent civilians are dying. I have no brief other than to make sure we don’t go into another war or that we go crazy killing each other. You do not want to give additional argument to new crazies who say ‘let’s go and bomb Iran.’”

The survey is meant to inform governments, international organizations, non-governmental organizations and the general public of the countries’ efforts to promote peace. It also intends to be a wake-up call for political leaders who have been reluctant to adopt policies that promote peace.

The results of the Index confirm a previous study carried out by several newspapers around the world, including the Guardian in Britain, Haaretz in Israel, La Presse and Toronto Star in Canada and Reforma in Mexico. The study found that 62% of Canadians and 57% of Mexicans believe that the world has become more dangerous because of U.S. policies.

That study also showed the British voters considered President George Bush as a greater danger to peace than either the North Korean leader Kim Jong-il or even the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It is a paradoxical finding that countries that were called part of an “axis of evil” are considered less dangerous to world peace than the U.S. itself. While 87% of British voters in that study considered that Osama bin Laden is a great or moderate threat to peace, 75% think the same of President George Bush.

The Global Index is the first study to rank countries according to their level of peacefulness, and to analyze the conditions that contribute to a more peaceful world.

The Index found that peace is correlated to indicators such as income, schooling and level of regional integration, and that peaceful countries have high levels of transparency of government proceedings and low levels of corruption.

That the U.S. -and the United Kingdom, ranked 49th- are so poorly ranked should be a significant cause of concern. It shows that the Iraq adventure has seriously damaged both countries’ reputation, one that will take a serious effort to redress, and has become a significant cause of world instability.

César Chelala is a co-winner of an Overseas Press Club of America award for an article on human rights.