What Really Happened Needs Your Help

June 18, 2008

 

 DesertPeace said “I can’t imagine the Net without a site like What Really Happened on it…. if it were to disappear so would a large percentage of the truth.”

Well, I, too and so many truthers cannot imagine the internet without What Really Happened.

I didn’t want to say this but I have a confession. When I started this blog, I knew nothing about politics and I didn’t know how to start or what to do. I found What Really Happened by mere chance and I liked that site. You will find a lot of my first posts here quoted from there. I can say that I am a student of What Really Happened and I’m so proud that I am because I am learning from the best and there still is a lot to learn so I don’t want WRH to stop. I want WRH to grow and to be the internet’s biggest lighthouse of truth.

What Really Happened doesn’t make a regular habit of campaigning for donations but things became tight lately.They don’t have huge corporate sponsors like the TV networks and some of the “gatekeeper” websites. They have neither applied for nor been given any grants by think tanks with agendas. They are totally dependent on small advertisers and your support to keep working and like everyone else in these dark times, They are getting a bit tight. They need your help. Thanks.

Click HERE to find a Donation Form….. and thank you!


For those who want to see the ugly truth of Israel (you gotta see this video “shot in 1950″)

June 17, 2008
There is an astonishing amount of ignorance about the basic facts of the so-called Arab-Israeli conflict.This video was shot in the late 1940s to educate the public about the plight of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who had been made homeless as a result of the violence and intimidation that accompanied the founding of the state of Israel.
  

What most Palestinians thought would be a temporary dislocation lasting only a few weeks at most became permanent. Homeless with just the clothes on their backs, they were left in the desert without food, water, and medical care to die.

 

As Israel celebrates its 60th birthday,
let’s take a look at what kind of a country
Israel really is.This is an old black and white film, made
before the Israeli War Party succeeded in
subverting US politics and news media.

When you hear the phrase “Palestinian
refugee camps”, this is what it meant
in the years after hundreds of thousands
of Palestinians were illegally evicted
from their lands by “newly born” Israel.
 
 

 

On this video, Dorothy Thompson speaks on the refugee problem. Refugees live in tents in the Gaza Strip, are given blankets and food by Egyptian soldiers, and receive flour from UNICEF. A Lebanese priest conducts services. Refugees work as plumbers, carpenters, tailors, and shoemakers in the city of Jerusalem. Doctors vaccinate refugees against disease. Shows the squalid living conditions in refugee camps, starving children, and emphasizes the hopeless condition of the refugees.


Ahmed Ismail is Signing off!!!

July 22, 2007

Dear visitors,

About 6 months ago, I started this blog. I loved this blog and I dedicated a lotta time to it. I still can`t believe that I am going to stop blogging here but that`s what I have to do.

In shaa Allah, I am going to start a new life in another country. I am pretty scared but excited. Travelling to other countries has always been one of my dreams.

This blog gave me the chance to make new friends. I will always cherish the time I`ve spent here and I will never forget my friends who supported this blog.

I don`t know whether I am going to blog here again or not but even if I started blogging again, it wouldn`t be in the near future.

I wish you all the best.

Asalamo Alaykom Wa rhmat Allah-i wa barakatoh

Ahmed Ismail


Blair engages with ‘moderate Muslims’ – but excludes the Muslim Council of Britain?

June 4, 2007

Tony Blair will address a high-level conference on Islam in London today as part of the Government’s strategy to engage with moderate Muslims and isolate religious extremists.

Politicians and religious leaders from more than 30 Muslim countries will attend the event. It will be addressed by Islamic scholars from Britain and overseas. In a sign of the importance attached to the event, it will open with a video message from the Prince of Wales, and this evening Gordon Brown will host a reception.

David Cameron will speak at the conference tomorrow, having been asked to do so by Mr Blair, as will the Bishop of London, Dr Richard Chartres.

There has been some criticism because the programme includes no speakers from the Muslim Council of Britain.

We know that Tony Blair intends to create a global foundation to foster “greater understanding” between the three “Abrahamic faiths” of Christianity, Judaism and Islam after he leaves Downing Street.

Well, Mr.Blair, excluding the Muslim Council of your own country isn`t going to promote the “greater understanding”.

One word Mr.Blair,

       PHONY


The Jewish Land Heist and the On-Going Judeo-Nazi Genocide Carried Out by Israel to Depopulate and Destroy the Non-Jewish Palestinian Concentration Camps where Israel Has Relocated Its Arab People

May 17, 2007

The following stories were found freely available upon the Internet at the web site so indicated below with each article and are archived by The Jew Watch Project for educational, research, and scholarly use under the “fair use” rules of the Copyright Law Title 17 Section 107.

Map of Shrinking Land Mass of Palestine in The Jew Watch Project’s Archive
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-genocide-palestinian-apartheidlaws-lossofpalestinianland1946to2000.html
The land map below is made available with a short historical and explanatory background commentary by Frank Weltner, Journalist and Librarian for The Jew Watch Project…The Jews place settlements of armed Israelis along all road routes within Palestinian living areas. They use these settlements to set up road blocks. Palestinians are roughed up, detained for hours and sometimes for days. The harassment and intimidation reduces the economy and keeps the Palestinians poor and unable to feed their families. Then, the Palestinians become fed up, sell their land, and emigrate to America, Canada, Australia, or the nations of Europe. As a result of this planned genocide by the Israeli Terror State, Palestine is rapidly becoming depopulated, and more and more Jews move in to take their place in a deadly racist spiral.The domestic and foreign policies of the Israeli Nazi State are very similar to that of Adolf Hitler’s “leibensraum” or “living space” projects in which foreign land was stolen, redistributed to Nazis from conquered non-German nationals.

The story below was found freely available upon the Internet on November 22, 2006 at http://blog.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/yossi_melman/2006/11/israel_stole_the_west_bank.html  and is archived by The Jew Watch Project for educational, research, and scholarly use under the “fair use” rules of the Copyright Law Title 17 Section 107.

 


PEACE, PROPAGANDA & THE PROMISED LAND 1 OF 2
BBC Presents the Unfair Media Coverage of Israel v. Arabs

PEACE, PROPAGANDA & THE PROMISED LAND 2 OF 2
BBC Presents the Unfair Media Coverage of Israel v. Arabs

Second 30 Minute Half of the 60 Minute BCC Program
Graphic Pictures, Commentaries, Analysis by Experts



http://blog.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/yossi_melman/2006/11/israel_stole_the_west_bank.html
Israel’s West Bank Theft
by Yossi Melman
Senior Commentator for the Israeli Daily Haaretz Newspaper
The Washington Post’s Blog at http://blog.washingtonpost.com
November 11, 2006Tel Aviv, Israel – The Israeli colonizing movement in the occupied West Bank is practically thievery, wrapped in false “security” arguments. The report published this week, by the Israeli left wing organization “Peace Now” provides the statistical and legal infrastructure and the basic database for what we — journalists, human rights organizations, liberal minded Israelis, and every Israeli with a grain of moral and ethical values — have known for many years.

The Peace Now report revealed that nearly 40% of land on which Jewish settlements sit is private land. It was confiscated from private Palestinian owners. This is in contrast to “state” land. The difference between “private” and “state” doesn’t make a big difference for national Palestinian aspirations. The systematic confiscation by the Israeli occupying authorities of land originated from both ownerships aims to undermine the idea that the Palestinian state, if and when it is established, could be a viable entity. But it does make a legal difference. As an occupying force, Israel, from the international, legal point of view is the legal heir to land and property owned by the previous owner — the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, which ruled the West Bank until 1967. Legally, though not morally, Israel has been entitled to use the state and public lands, according to its needs, without, however, changing or determining the final status of the lands. But it is illegal, immoral and corrupt to confiscate land from its private owners and hand it to new ones.

The Israeli colonizing campaign in the West Bank has witnessed several stages. First, after the Six Day War (1967) under Labor governments, it inherited state and public lands. Small parts of it were used usually for genuine state security needs. Military bases and posts were built on the land. By nature they were supposed to be temporary and handed over if a peace agreement would have been signed. The Arab states, though, refused to recognize Israel, to negotiate, and sign a peace treaty. After 1977 when the right wing Likud government led by Menachem Begin came to power, the policy changed. From now, the state land was not used any longer for “state security” needs. The land was given to private Jewish owners- organizations representing he extreme right religious zealots of the “Bloc of Faithful”. They built on the land more and more settlements and slowly but surely with government’s support, extended and expanded their areas, which were under their control. Since the early 1980′, a third stage began. Private lands were confiscated from their Palestinian owners for supposedly “state and public needs”. But in most cases, as the report shows — the arguments given were flat lies. The confiscated land was appropriated not for public or security necessities but to accommodate the Jewish colonizing movement.

Yet, the colonizing policy is not irreversible. We saw from the dismantle of Jewish settlements a year ago in Gaza that if there is a strong and determined Israeli leader, like Premier Ariel Sharon, such a step is doable and can be repeated in the West Bank too.

The problem is, however, that Israeli and Palestinians policies and desires are incompatible. Like two parallels, they have never met. When Israel was generous and accommodating and ready to compromise – like in the 1967-1977 decade, the PLO still was carried away by inflamed rhetoric of destroying Israel and rejectionist attitude. When the PLO changed in the 1990’s, Israel was not that generous and less ready to make concessions. And once again when Premier Ehud Barak, supported and encouraged by President Bill Clinton in Camp David 2000, was ready to reach a comprehensive and far reaching agreement with the Palestinians it was once again Arafat who said no. Instead Arafat instructed to launch a new round of violence – the second Intifada – and refueled the Israeli-Palestinian flames. This led to a new vicious circle of Palestinian suicide bombing attacks and Israeli targeted killings and aerial bombings and, more importantly, to the election of a Hamas government.

As I see it now, the number one problem is to ignite the peace process. To start talking. This can happen only if Hamas accepts the three conditions set by the Israeli government and the Bush administration and accepted by the “Quartet” (Russia, EU, UN and USA): to recognize the right of Israel, to stop terrorism and to honor agreements signed by previous Palestinian governments. But so far Hamas refuses to do it. In order to accept these conditions Hamas has to change its ‘”pots” — its manifesto and ideology; in other words, it has to change its very nature. Once it happens — and at the moment I am very pessimistic, or shall I say, I’m rather realistic — the land and the settlements would be a secondary obstacle. It will be very painful for Israel to dismantle more than 100 settlements and relocate and resettle 250,00 Jewish inhabitants. To do so Israel might face a “mini” civil war, but the majority of Israelis are ready to make the sacrifice and concession. It will be doable but one needs two for tango.

Yossi Melman

ISRAEL

Yossi Melman is a senior commentator for the Israeli daily Haaretz. He specializes in intelligence, security, terrorism and strategic issues. An author of seven books on these topics he is now writing (with Meir Javedanfar) a book on Iran’s President and his desire for nuclear weapons to be published next spring in the U.S.A.
 


Demonstration Against Israeli Theft of a Farm
Palestinians Waving Flags Confront the Israeli Confiscation

The Israeli Nazis Have Been Relocating the Native Population
In Order to Steal the Entire Area of Palestine for Israel Against U.N. Laws

Palestinians Protest Destruction of PALESTINE
Destroying their Nation, Culture, and Homes

Nazi Jewish Soldiers Beat the Peaceful Protesters with Clubs
Students End Bleeding from their Beatings

THE NEW WAILING WALL
Making the People of Jerusalem into Ghetto Rats

The Israeli Terror Nation Encloses Native People
Inside a Cone of Silence, a Wall of Jewish Hatred for Non-Jews

http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-worldconspiracies-restitution-issues-palestine-land-heist.html


Why Do Jewish grandmothers patrol West Bank checkpoints?

March 23, 2007

I just read this article, which another truthseeking blogger talked about, on a Turkish news website and I really liked the idea that goodness  is still there and that sometimes you get help from the unexpected.

Jewish grandmothers patrol West Bank checkpoints

Bernd Debusmann
JERUSALEM – Reuters

Hanna Barag remembers the day an Israeli soldier called her a Palestinian whore. She was 67 and had just joined Machsomwatch, an all-woman group set up to curb human rights abuses at military checkpoints in the West Bank.

  ”It was at the Qalandia checkpoint between Jerusalem and Ramallah,” Barag said, “And the remark at first struck me speechless. But then I asked him two questions: ‘Do you really think a woman my age has a chance at that profession? And would you say what you said to me to your grandmother?’”

  The soldier said nothing but was embarrassed, and when Barag, who was born in Israel and describes herself as a Zionist, returned for another “shift” of watchdog duty a week later, the soldier was there – and apologized.

  That was in the early days of Machsomwatch, set up in 2001 by three Israeli women who were alarmed by a spate of reports of beatings and abuse of Palestinians at the hands of Israeli soldiers manning checkpoints.

  The group takes its name from the Hebrew word for checkpoint, machsom. From a few dozen in the beginning, Machsomwatch now numbers around 500, many of them grandmothers, who take turns watching 40-odd checkpoints in the West Bank.

  ”We do this 364 days a year,” said Barag. “Except for Yom Kippur (the most solemn Jewish holiday).”

  The sight of Barag, now 71 and just five feet (1.52 meters) tall, recently in action at a busy checkpoint south of Nablus shows why women are more effective than men in dealing with soldiers when lines are long and tempers frayed.

  After conveying, with a smile, a complaint to an officer who towered over her bird-like figure, she remarked: “Who wants to fight with a little old lady?”

Stillborn babies:

  Over the years, Machsomwatch has recorded a long list of checkpoint incidents: babies stillborn to mothers held up in queues, sick patients denied passage to hospitals, arguments that ended in Palestinians shot, food rotting on the way to market, students missing their final exams and bridegrooms their weddings.

  The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Jerusalem says there are 528 permanent and temporary checkpoints in the West Bank, 40 percent more than a year ago.

  Most are not between the West Bank and Israel but between West Bank towns and villages, a fact that makes anti-occupation Israelis and Palestinians doubt the Israeli government’s contention that their primary purpose is security.

  ”The idea is to make life so unpleasant and so uncomfortable for them that they just give up and leave, emigrate to an Arab country, to Canada, wherever they can go,” said Nomi Lalo, another veteran of Machsomwatch.

  For Palestinians, the checkpoints, and the permits they need to cross them, are a constant source of anger, resentment and frustration.

  ”The checkpoints haunt your mind,” said Sireen Droubi, a teacher who has to go through several on her commute from her home village to work in the northern West Bank city of Tulkarm.

  ”You think of them all the time. You never know how long it will take to pass them. You can’t make plans. It’s like living in a cage.”

Criticism:

  The vast majority of Israelis think checkpoints and travel restrictions for the 2.4 million Palestinians in the West Bank are needed to protect Israel from Palestinian suicide bombers.

  ”As long as they bomb us, let them stand in line as long as it takes,” said one Tel Aviv resident. “If it’s 10 hours, too bad.” Tel Aviv has been the target of several suicide bombs, the latest last April. It killed nine people and injured 50 at a popular restaurant.

  Barag and several of her fellow activists are on a right-wing group’s Internet list of “Self-Hating Israel-Threatening (SHIT) Jews” and the right-wing volunteer group Women in Green has called them Judeonazis.

  Some Machsomwatch members also face criticism from their own families. “My four brothers all served in the army and they think I’m crazy,” said Barag. Her own army service included a stint as a secretary for Moshe Dayan, then chief of staff of the Israeli armed forces.

  Lalo has two sons who have completed their army service and a 17-year-old who is about to begin. “My eldest is very critical of what I do. But I think it’s important. We are making a difference.”

How much is difficult to judge but the women’s monthly incident log, published on its website (www.machsomwatch.org), is read by the Israeli Defense Force, advocacy groups and probably at least one member of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s family. His left-wing daughter, Dana, belongs to Machsomwatch.


Information “DEFICIENCY”?

February 26, 2007

Referring to my previous post, if anyone goes through the sources of my story, something strange will be noticed.

The BBC Arabic article does not include the whole truth about the matter. Read the English articles using the links provided in that post. You will see how much info that Arabic BBC article lacks. The English articles show the details of the disaster supported with numbers of the starving people while the Arabic article includes what may be seen as a mild problem that world food organizations are taking care of. So who is responsile for not showing Arabs the whole truth? The truth that they should know and react upon?


Starving Palestinians

February 26, 2007

In a BBC news story, published on Friday, July26, 2002, a report commisioned by the US Agency for International Development showed the increasingly poverty levels and health problems in Palestine. It also showed high dependence of Palestinians on food handouts and a big rise in malnutrition in Palestinian children under the age of five.

I got freaked out when I read that “According to the World Bank, 70% of Palestinians live on less than $2 a day.”

“This photo is for a Palestinian babygirl suffering from the symptoms of nutrition deficiencies”

It is a ”humanitarian disaster” as the US ambassador to Israel said to the Shimon Peres, former Israeli Prime Minister. Peres has said the government will release some $40m of frozen tax revenues to the Palestinians.

Anyone would think that that would decrease the problem a little bit.The link for this article is:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2153377.stm

In his analystic article ”Hungry In Gaza”, published on Wednesday, March5, 2003 in the Guardian, Peter Hansen mentioned that “a dreadful, silent malnutrition is stalking the Palestinians. ” and that “the Palestinians are suffering in the main from micro- nutrient deficiencies – what the World Health Organisation calls the “hidden hunger”.

Well, actually micro-nutrient deficiencies hinder a normal mental and physical growth. So The mental and physical development of a generation of Palestinian children hangs in the balance.

For more details about that “Hidden Hunger” bad effects on the children, please refer to this link where you can read the whole article handling the implications of such a problem.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,907727,00.html

But if you already noticed, that was all in the past. (As you can see the first article was in 2002 and the second in 2003)

However, after more than about five years and after the whole world witnessed the hungry children in Palestine including all the organizations and aid agencies all over the world, you may think that the problem is at least not getting worse.

The fact is the problem is getting worse and worse. Recently, there were so many news sotries announcing that “NEARLY HALF THE PALESTINIANS ARE HUNGRY”

According to a U.N. recent report nearly half the palestinian families in Gaza and the West Bank do not have enough food. So, the problem now is not a lack of vitamins and other nutritions. It is a lack of food itself. The stuff we put in our stomach to feel full. To stop that stomach from barking. 

 The report said 46 percent of Gaza and West Bank families are “food insecure” or face the possibility of becoming food insecure in the near future, and many of those households desperate for nourishment are selling off assets that will have an “irreversible impact on livelihoods.”

The problem is especially acute in Gaza, where four out of five families lack even the most basic food items, the Independent said.

Guess what, afer the Israelis got blamed for the starvation they created, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said his government will continue talks with Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas to work to improve the quality of life in the Palestinian territories, the Jerusalem Post said. Well, we all know that Israel is satisfied with the fact that Palestinians are starving. So no matter what they do, it won`t work. Theu are now completing the process of building that BARRIER that will increase the problem and create more than starvation.

34 percent of Palestinian nursing homes earn less than a dollar and a half a day. What???

According to that 2002 article, they earned about 2 dollars aday. Now it is a dollar and a half. What is next? So after 4 years or so, we will hear that these people are earning a dollar aday and after about ten other years they will earn NOTHING?

So, How Palestinians should react towards all these injustice acts? What do you expect them to do when they see their own kids suffering? They want a better life for their children. A life that they didn`t have.

Here are some links discussing the recent U.N. report and the problem all Palestinians are facing:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1789283/posts?page=27

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellitecid=1171894492918&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter

لمتحدثي اللغة العربية فقط يمكن قراءة تفاصيل الموضوع على هذا الرابط:

  http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/arabic/middle_east_news/newsid_6388000/6388547.stm We all pray for you brothers and sisters, We all pray for Palestine. We pray that you get your freedom. We pray that we all get our “Al-Aqsa” back.


US Troops, How Many Children Did You Kill Today?

February 24, 2007

I read today at Al-Jazeera web site That two children died in a Baghdad battle yesterday. The kids were no older than 12 years old.

I quote this from Al-Jazeera news story:

The statement said soldiers on the western side of the

Tigris had engaged two armed men trying to smuggle weapons across the river by boat.

The men fled to the eastern side, where they were joined by three other gunmen, the military said.

Ok, in the Al Jazeera news story I read that a Reuters photographer, witnessed that incident, said that he saw about 30 US soldiers and several Stryker armoured vehicles, backed up by two helicopters, on the western side of the river.

Oh Allah, 30 US soldiers, several armoured vehicles and two helicopters to fight 5 men? “”"Is that enough?”"”

Sorry, I know the situation is too serious to include sarcasm but I couldn`t help it.

A US military spokesman said:

“We are looking into the circumstances of what caused the incident,” and said it was unclear if the children had been hurt from gunfire or shrapnel from any explosion.

 Who cares?

So, what about these dead children? Of course they will be forgotten and America will consider them a price for a free and stable Iraq. cut the nonsense.

If one American child is wounded, the whole world will stand up and wars will be launched for revenge. But the blood of our children is so cheap. I am going to say no more. Think carefully about this:

What if one of these two children was yours?


US Plans In Iraq “DELUSIONAL”

February 23, 2007

They think they can predict everything. Well, they can`t.

 According to the BBC, The National Security Archive (NSA) which is an independent institute of research at George
Washington University obtained documents  showing that the American invading plans for Iraq were unrealistic. The documents were prepared in August 2002 by the now-retired Gen Tommy Franks and other top commanders at the time.

Let’s compare facts: The documents  showed:

(1)  5,000 US troops is the number that would remain in
Iraq by December 2006.

(2) The commanders predicted that after the fighting was over there would be a two- to three-month “stabilisation” phase, followed by an 18- to 24-month “recovery” stage.

(3) They projected that the US forces would be almost completely “re-deployed” out of Iraq at the end of the “transition” phase – within 45 months of invasion.“Completely unrealistic assumptions about a post-Saddam Iraq permeate these war plans,” NSA executive director Thomas Blanton said in a statement posted on the organisation’s website.

Well, America currently has 132,000 troops in Iraq.

So much for ASSUMPTIONS !!!

The US plans will always fail because they are not built on a stable ground. The war itself is made on false allegations. Those planners do not have faith in what they are doing. They, deep inside, know that what they do is wrong.Look what they did to Iraq. The country is on the brink of a civil war.Is this the stability they were talking about?And now they are sending more troops “to handle the violence”. The violence that they created.

If you want to read more about this visit this BBC link:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6364507.stm

Here is the Arabic link:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/arabic/middle_east_news/newsid_6365000/6365233.stm